Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
The EMT factor ZEB1 paradoxically inhibits EMT in BRAF-mutant carcinomas
Ester Sánchez-Tilló, Leire Pedrosa, Ingrid Vila, Yongxu Chen, Balázs Győrffy, Lidia Sánchez-Moral, Laura Siles, Juan J. Lozano, Anna Esteve-Codina, Douglas S. Darling, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Antoni Castells, Joan Maurel, Antonio Postigo
Ester Sánchez-Tilló, Leire Pedrosa, Ingrid Vila, Yongxu Chen, Balázs Győrffy, Lidia Sánchez-Moral, Laura Siles, Juan J. Lozano, Anna Esteve-Codina, Douglas S. Darling, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Antoni Castells, Joan Maurel, Antonio Postigo
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Gastroenterology Oncology

The EMT factor ZEB1 paradoxically inhibits EMT in BRAF-mutant carcinomas

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Despite being in the same pathway, mutations of KRAS and BRAF in colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) determine distinct progression courses. ZEB1 induces an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and is associated with worse progression in most carcinomas. Using samples from patients with CRC, mouse models of KrasG12D and BrafV600E CRC, and a Zeb1-deficient mouse, we show that ZEB1 had opposite functions in KRAS- and BRAF-mutant CRCs. In KrasG12D CRCs, ZEB1 was correlated with a worse prognosis and a higher number of larger and undifferentiated (mesenchymal or EMT-like) tumors. Surprisingly, in BrafV600E CRC, ZEB1 was associated with better prognosis; fewer, smaller, and more differentiated (reduced EMT) primary tumors; and fewer metastases. ZEB1 was positively correlated in KRAS-mutant CRC cells and negatively in BRAF-mutant CRC cells with gene signatures for EMT, cell proliferation and survival, and ERK signaling. On a mechanistic level, ZEB1 knockdown in KRAS-mutant CRC cells increased apoptosis and reduced clonogenicity and anchorage-independent growth; the reverse occurred in BRAFV600E CRC cells. ZEB1 is associated with better prognosis and reduced EMT signature in patients harboring BRAF CRCs. These data suggest that ZEB1 can function as a tumor suppressor in BRAF-mutant CRCs, highlighting the importance of considering the KRAS/BRAF mutational background of CRCs in therapeutic strategies targeting ZEB1/EMT.

Authors

Ester Sánchez-Tilló, Leire Pedrosa, Ingrid Vila, Yongxu Chen, Balázs Győrffy, Lidia Sánchez-Moral, Laura Siles, Juan J. Lozano, Anna Esteve-Codina, Douglas S. Darling, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Antoni Castells, Joan Maurel, Antonio Postigo

×

Figure 5

ZEB1 inhibits cell death and promotes clonogenicity, migration, and tumorigenesis in KRASG12D but not in BRAFV600E CRC cells.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
ZEB1 inhibits cell death and promotes clonogenicity, migration, and tumo...
(A) Cell viability of KRAS (LS174T) and mutant (mut) BRAF (RKO) CRC cells stably infected with lentivirus with an shRNA control (CTL) (black) or against ZEB1 (ZEB1 KD) (red). Cell viability by an MTT assay (n ≥ 5) is represented as the mean with the SD. (B) Opposite regulation of cell cycle progression by stable knockdown of ZEB1 in KRAS- and BRAF-mutant CRC cells. Share of cells in G2/M, S, GO/G1, or DNA fragmentation. (C) KRAS- and BRAF-mutant CRC cells transiently transfected with siCtl (CTL) or siZEB1 (ZEB1 KD) were assessed for apoptosis (n ≥ 4). (D) As in C, but for 2D clonogenicity. The plating efficiency of siCtl cells was set to 100 (n = 4). (E) 3D anchorage-independent growth of KRAS- and BRAF-mutant CRC cells as in C. Mean relative number of colonies with the SD (n ≥ 4). Right: Original magnification, ×100. (F) Cell migration in KRAS- and BRAF-mutant CRC cells, as in C, assessed by wound healing assays (n ≥ 3 in triplicate). (G) Cell migration in KRAS- and BRAF-mutant CRC cells, as in F, assessed by Transwell assays (left; n ≥ 3 in triplicate). (H) ZEB1 promotes tumorigenesis in KRAS-mutant CRC xenografts. Left: Tumor volume of 6 mice (3 males and 3 females) s.c. engrafted with cells stably infected with lentivirus encoding an shRNA control (CTL) (black) or against ZEB1 (ZEB1 KD) (red). Two-way ANOVA test was used for comparison. Right: Ex vivo tumor volume and images. (I) ZEB1 reduces tumorigenesis in BRAF mut CRC xenografts. As in H, but with BRAF-mutant CRC cells. Unless stated, an unpaired t test was used; Bonferroni’s test was used in A and F. P values are reported in Supplemental Table 16. ***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, or *P ≤ 0.05.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts