Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Mapping the metabolic reprogramming induced by sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition
Aviram Kogot-Levin, … , Eyal Gottlieb, Gil Leibowitz
Aviram Kogot-Levin, … , Eyal Gottlieb, Gil Leibowitz
Published February 21, 2023
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(7):e164296. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.164296.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Metabolism Therapeutics

Mapping the metabolic reprogramming induced by sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Diabetes is associated with increased risk for kidney disease, heart failure, and mortality. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) prevent these adverse outcomes; however, the mechanisms involved are not clear. We generated a roadmap of the metabolic alterations that occur in different organs in diabetes and in response to SGLT2i. In vivo metabolic labeling with 13C-glucose in normoglycemic and diabetic mice treated with or without dapagliflozin, followed by metabolomics and metabolic flux analyses, showed that, in diabetes, glycolysis and glucose oxidation are impaired in the kidney, liver, and heart. Treatment with dapagliflozin failed to rescue glycolysis. SGLT2 inhibition increased glucose oxidation in all organs; in the kidney, this was associated with modulation of the redox state. Diabetes was associated with altered methionine cycle metabolism, evident by decreased betaine and methionine levels, whereas treatment with SGLT2i increased hepatic betaine along with decreased homocysteine levels. mTORC1 activity was inhibited by SGLT2i along with stimulation of AMPK in both normoglycemic and diabetic animals, possibly explaining the protective effects against kidney, liver, and heart diseases. Collectively, our findings suggest that SGLT2i induces metabolic reprogramming orchestrated by AMPK-mTORC1 signaling with common and distinct effects in various tissues, with implications for diabetes and aging.

Authors

Aviram Kogot-Levin, Yael Riahi, Ifat Abramovich, Ofri Mosenzon, Bella Agranovich, Liat Kadosh, Rachel Ben-Haroush Schyr, Doron Kleiman, Liad Hinden, Erol Cerasi, Danny Ben-Zvi, Ernesto Bernal-Mizrachi, Joseph Tam, Eyal Gottlieb, Gil Leibowitz

×

Figure 7

Effects of diabetes and of treatment with SGLT2i on one carbon and amino acid metabolism.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Effects of diabetes and of treatment with SGLT2i on one carbon and amino...
(A–C) Heatmaps showing the relative levels of one carbon pathway metabolites in liver (A), kidney cortex (B), and heart (C). (D) mRNA levels of methionine cycle-related enzymes in the liver. (E–G) Heatmaps showing the relative levels of hepatic amino acids (E), acetylated amino acids (F), and urea cycle metabolites (G). Each square represents the average metabolite log2 fold change relative to WT control mice. (H) mRNA levels of urea cycle enzymes in liver extracts. Data represent the mean ± SEM, n = 3–6 mice per group. Data were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts