We have developed an inducible Huntington’s disease (HD) mouse model that allows temporal control of whole-body allele-specific mutant huntingtin (mHtt) expression. We asked whether moderate global lowering of mHtt (~50%) was sufficient for long-term amelioration of HD-related deficits and, if so, whether early mHtt lowering (before measurable deficits) was required. Both early and late mHtt lowering delayed behavioral dysfunction and mHTT protein aggregation, as measured biochemically. However, long-term follow-up revealed that the benefits, in all mHtt-lowering groups, attenuated by 12 months of age. While early mHtt lowering attenuated cortical and striatal transcriptional dysregulation evaluated at 6 months of age, the benefits diminished by 12 months of age, and late mHtt lowering did not ameliorate striatal transcriptional dysregulation at 12 months of age. Only early mHtt lowering delayed the elevation in cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain that we observed in our model starting at 9 months of age. As small-molecule HTT-lowering therapeutics progress to the clinic, our findings suggest that moderate mHtt lowering allows disease progression to continue, albeit at a slower rate, and could be relevant to the degree of mHTT lowering required to sustain long-term benefits in humans.
Deanna M. Marchionini, Jeh-Ping Liu, Alberto Ambesi-Impiombato, Kimberly Kerker, Kim Cirillo, Mukesh Bansal, Rich Mushlin, Daniela Brunner, Sylvie Ramboz, Mei Kwan, Kirsten Kuhlbrodt, Karsten Tillack, Finn Peters, Leena Rauhala, John Obenauer, Jonathan R. Greene, Christopher Hartl, Vinod Khetarpal, Brenda Lager, Jim Rosinski, Jeff Aaronson, Morshed Alam, Ethan Signer, Ignacio Muñoz-Sanjuán, David Howland, Scott O. Zeitlin
Usage data is cumulative from July 2023 through July 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 630 | 344 |
117 | 74 | |
Figure | 266 | 2 |
Supplemental data | 142 | 34 |
Citation downloads | 28 | 0 |
Totals | 1,183 | 454 |
Total Views | 1,637 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.