Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Intraperitoneal injection of class A TLR9 agonist enhances anti–PD-1 immunotherapy in colorectal peritoneal metastases
Ting Jiang, Hongji Zhang, Yiming Li, Preethi Jayakumar, Hong Liao, Hai Huang, Timothy R. Billiar, Meihong Deng
Ting Jiang, Hongji Zhang, Yiming Li, Preethi Jayakumar, Hong Liao, Hai Huang, Timothy R. Billiar, Meihong Deng
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

Intraperitoneal injection of class A TLR9 agonist enhances anti–PD-1 immunotherapy in colorectal peritoneal metastases

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Peritoneal metastases are associated with a low response rate to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. The numbers of peritoneal resident macrophages (PRMs) are reversely correlated with the response rate to ICB therapy. We have previously shown that TLR9 in fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs) plays a critical role in regulating peritoneal immune cell recruitment. However, the role of TLR9 in FRCs in regulating PRMs is unclear. Here, we demonstrated that the class A TLR9 agonist, ODN1585, markedly enhanced the efficacy of anti–PD-1 therapy in mouse models of colorectal peritoneal metastases. ODN1585 injected i.p. reduced the numbers of Tim4+ PRMs and enhanced CD8+ T cell antitumor immunity. Mechanistically, treatment of ODN1585 suppressed the expression of genes required for retinoid metabolism in FRCs, and this was associated with reduced expression of the PRM lineage–defining transcription factor GATA6. Selective deletion of TLR9 in FRCs diminished the benefit of ODN1585 in anti–PD-1 therapy in reducing peritoneal metastases. The crosstalk between PRMs and FRCs may be utilized to develop new strategies to improve the efficacy of ICB therapy for peritoneal metastases.

Authors

Ting Jiang, Hongji Zhang, Yiming Li, Preethi Jayakumar, Hong Liao, Hai Huang, Timothy R. Billiar, Meihong Deng

×

Figure 2

ODN1585 alters the peritoneal immunity during colorectal peritoneal metastases.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
ODN1585 alters the peritoneal immunity during colorectal peritoneal meta...
Mice were inoculated with MC38-luciferase-GFP (1 million cells/mouse, i.p.) and received indicated treatment, as shown in Figure 1A. Peritoneal cells were collected at 3 weeks after tumor inoculation. The numbers and phenotypes of peritoneal cells were analyzed using flow cytometry. (A) The number of CD45+ cells. (B) The percentage of PRMs in CD45+ cells. (C) The percentage of Tim4+ cells in PRMs. (D) The percentage of neutrophils in CD45+ cells. (E) The percentage of CD8+ T cells in CD45+ cells. (F–H) The percentage of (F) IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells, (G) PD-1+CD8+ T cells, and (H) CD39+CD8+ T cells in CD8+ T cells. (I) The percentage of CD4+ T cells in CD45+ cells. (J and K) The percentage of (J) T-bet+CD4+ T cells and (K) Foxp3+CD4+ T cells in CD4+ T cells. Data are shown as mean ± SD from 2 separate experiments. Symbols represent individual mice. Statistical differences were determined using 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. Only the significant differences are labeled.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts