Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and glucocorticoids differentially affect skeletal muscle inflammation and pathology in muscular dystrophy
Zachary M. Howard, … , Federica Accornero, Jill A. Rafael-Fortney
Zachary M. Howard, … , Federica Accornero, Jill A. Rafael-Fortney
Published August 30, 2022
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(19):e159875. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.159875.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Muscle biology

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and glucocorticoids differentially affect skeletal muscle inflammation and pathology in muscular dystrophy

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) slow cardiomyopathy in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and improve skeletal muscle pathology and function in dystrophic mice. However, glucocorticoids, known antiinflammatory drugs, remain a standard of care for DMD, despite substantial side effects. Exact mechanisms underlying mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) signaling contribution to dystrophy are unknown. Whether MRAs affect inflammation in dystrophic muscles and how they compare with glucocorticoids is unclear. The MRA spironolactone and glucocorticoid prednisolone were each administered for 1 week to dystrophic mdx mice during peak skeletal muscle necrosis to compare effects on inflammation. Both drugs reduced cytokine levels in mdx quadriceps, but prednisolone elevated diaphragm cytokines. Spironolactone did not alter myeloid populations in mdx quadriceps or diaphragms, but prednisolone increased F4/80hi macrophages. Both spironolactone and prednisolone reduced inflammatory gene expression in myeloid cells sorted from mdx quadriceps, while prednisolone additionally perturbed cell cycle genes. Spironolactone also repressed myeloid expression of the gene encoding fibronectin, while prednisolone increased its expression. Overall, spironolactone exhibits antiinflammatory properties without altering leukocyte distribution within skeletal muscles, while prednisolone suppresses quadriceps cytokines but increases diaphragm cytokines and pathology. Antiinflammatory properties of MRAs and different limb and respiratory muscle responses to glucocorticoids should be considered when optimizing treatments for patients with DMD.

Authors

Zachary M. Howard, Chetan K. Gomatam, Charles P. Rabolli, Jeovanna Lowe, Arden B. Piepho, Shyam S. Bansal, Federica Accornero, Jill A. Rafael-Fortney

×

Figure 1

Cytokine and chemokine levels in spironolactone- and prednisolone-treated mdx skeletal muscles.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Cytokine and chemokine levels in spironolactone- and prednisolone-treate...
(A) Proteome profiler cytokine array immunoblots incubated with lysates from spironolactone-treated (SPR-treated) and prednisolone-treated (PRD-treated) 5.5-week-old mdx quadriceps compared with vehicle-treated (VEH-treated) controls (5 mg of protein pooled from n = 5 SPR, n = 4 PRD, n = 5 VEH). (B) Immunoblots incubated with lysates from SPR- and PRD-treated 5.5-week-old mdx diaphragms compared with VEH-treated controls (5 mg of protein). (C and D) Immunoblot pixel densitometry bar graph displayed as a ratio comparing cytokine and chemokine levels between SPR- and VEH-treated mdx quadriceps and mdx diaphragms. (E and F) Immunoblot pixel densitometry bar graph displayed as a ratio comparing cytokine and chemokine levels between PRD- and VEH-treated mdx quadriceps and mdx diaphragms. A trend-line (dashes) is placed at y = 1 on each bar graph to visualize upregulated and downregulated cytokines and chemokines. (G) ELISA for IL-1β on soluble protein extracts from quadriceps muscles isolated from mdx mice treated for 2 weeks with VEH (n = 5), SPR (n = 5), or PRD (n = 4) compared with untreated WT control (C57) (n = 3). Statistics used were ANOVA with Dunnett’s test comparing each group with the VEH. *P ≤ 0.05.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts