Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

T cell response to intact SARS-CoV-2 includes coronavirus cross-reactive and variant-specific components
Lichen Jing, Xia Wu, Maxwell P. Krist, Tien-Ying Hsiang, Victoria L. Campbell, Christopher L. McClurkan, Sydney M. Favors, Lawrence A. Hemingway, Charmie Godornes, Denise Q. Tong, Stacy Selke, Angela C. LeClair, Chu-Woo Pyo, Daniel E. Geraghty, Kerry J. Laing, Anna Wald, Michael Gale Jr., David M. Koelle
Lichen Jing, Xia Wu, Maxwell P. Krist, Tien-Ying Hsiang, Victoria L. Campbell, Christopher L. McClurkan, Sydney M. Favors, Lawrence A. Hemingway, Charmie Godornes, Denise Q. Tong, Stacy Selke, Angela C. LeClair, Chu-Woo Pyo, Daniel E. Geraghty, Kerry J. Laing, Anna Wald, Michael Gale Jr., David M. Koelle
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Infectious disease

T cell response to intact SARS-CoV-2 includes coronavirus cross-reactive and variant-specific components

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 provokes a robust T cell response. Peptide-based studies exclude antigen processing and presentation biology, which may influence T cell detection studies. To focus on responses to whole virus and complex antigens, we used intact SARS-CoV-2 and full-length proteins with DCs to activate CD8 and CD4 T cells from convalescent people. T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing showed partial repertoire preservation after expansion. Resultant CD8 T cells recognize SARS-CoV-2–infected respiratory tract cells, and CD4 T cells detect inactivated whole viral antigen. Specificity scans with proteome-covering protein/peptide arrays show that CD8 T cells are oligospecific per subject and that CD4 T cell breadth is higher. Some CD4 T cell lines enriched using SARS-CoV-2 cross-recognize whole seasonal coronavirus (sCoV) antigens, with protein, peptide, and HLA restriction validation. Conversely, recognition of some epitopes is eliminated for SARS-CoV-2 variants, including spike (S) epitopes in the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta variant lineages.

Authors

Lichen Jing, Xia Wu, Maxwell P. Krist, Tien-Ying Hsiang, Victoria L. Campbell, Christopher L. McClurkan, Sydney M. Favors, Lawrence A. Hemingway, Charmie Godornes, Denise Q. Tong, Stacy Selke, Angela C. LeClair, Chu-Woo Pyo, Daniel E. Geraghty, Kerry J. Laing, Anna Wald, Michael Gale Jr., David M. Koelle

×

Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 705 97
PDF 127 16
Figure 460 9
Table 38 0
Supplemental data 104 10
Citation downloads 84 0
Totals 1,518 132
Total Views 1,650

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts