Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
EPCR-PAR1 biased signaling regulates perfusion recovery and neovascularization in peripheral ischemia
Magdalena L. Bochenek, … , Wolfram Ruf, Katrin Schäfer
Magdalena L. Bochenek, … , Wolfram Ruf, Katrin Schäfer
Published June 14, 2022
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(14):e157701. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.157701.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Angiogenesis Vascular biology

EPCR-PAR1 biased signaling regulates perfusion recovery and neovascularization in peripheral ischemia

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Blood clot formation initiates ischemic events, but coagulation roles during postischemic tissue repair are poorly understood. The endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) regulates coagulation, as well as immune and vascular signaling, by protease activated receptors (PARs). Here, we show that endothelial EPCR-PAR1 signaling supports reperfusion and neovascularization in hindlimb ischemia in mice. Whereas deletion of PAR2 or PAR4 did not impair angiogenesis, EPCR and PAR1 deficiency or PAR1 resistance to cleavage by activated protein C caused markedly reduced postischemic reperfusion in vivo and angiogenesis in vitro. These findings were corroborated by biased PAR1 agonism in isolated primary endothelial cells. Loss of EPCR-PAR1 signaling upregulated hemoglobin expression and reduced endothelial nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. Defective angiogenic sprouting was rescued by the NO donor DETA-NO, whereas NO scavenging increased hemoglobin and mesenchymal marker expression in human and mouse endothelial cells. Vascular specimens from patients with ischemic peripheral artery disease exhibited increased hemoglobin expression, and soluble EPCR and NO levels were reduced in plasma. Our data implicate endothelial EPCR-PAR1 signaling in the hypoxic response of endothelial cells and identify suppression of hemoglobin expression as an unexpected link between coagulation signaling, preservation of endothelial cell NO bioavailability, support of neovascularization, and prevention of fibrosis.

Authors

Magdalena L. Bochenek, Rajinikanth Gogiraju, Stefanie Großmann, Janina Krug, Jennifer Orth, Sabine Reyda, George S. Georgiadis, Henri M. Spronk, Stavros Konstantinides, Thomas Münzel, John H. Griffin, Philipp Wild, Christine Espinola-Klein, Wolfram Ruf, Katrin Schäfer

×

Figure 2

Reperfusion and angiogenic sprout formation in mice with global PAR1 deficiency or with R41Q or R46Q point mutations in the PAR1 gene.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Reperfusion and angiogenic sprout formation in mice with global PAR1 def...
(A) Representative laser Doppler perfusion images in C57BL/6N control mice (first column), C57BL/6N PAR1–/– (second column), C57BL/6N PAR1 R41Q (third column), and C57BL/6N PAR1 R46Q mice (fourth column) immediately before and after, as well as on, day 28 after induction of hindlimb ischemia are shown. (B and C) Summary of the quantitative analysis of the laser signal (expressed as % of the contralateral, nonischemic site) in C57BL/6N control mice (n = 12) and C57BL/6N PAR1–/– (n = 9, n = 6 after day 14) (B) or in C57BL/6N PAR1 R41Q (n = 13, n = 9 after day 14; purple) and C57BL/6N PAR1 R46Q (n = 13, n = 9 after day 14; orange (C). Data from B are shown in gray for comparison as well. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001 versus values immediately after surgery; ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 versus control mice at the same time point; 2-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple-comparison test. (D) Representative bright-field images of aortic rings isolated from C57BL/6N control mice and from C57BL/6N PAR1 R41Q and C57BL/6N PAR1 R46Q. Scale bar: 10 μm. (E) Quantitative analysis of total length of sprouts migrated from aortic rings of C57BL/6N control mice, C57BL/6N PAR1 R41Q (purple), and C57BL/6N PAR1 R46Q (orange). *P < 0.05 and ****P < 0.0001 versus C57BL/6N; #P < 0.05 versus C57BL/6N PAR1 R41Q; n = 3 biological replicates per 2 experimental repeats. One-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons.

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts