Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
EPCR-PAR1 biased signaling regulates perfusion recovery and neovascularization in peripheral ischemia
Magdalena L. Bochenek, Rajinikanth Gogiraju, Stefanie Großmann, Janina Krug, Jennifer Orth, Sabine Reyda, George S. Georgiadis, Henri M. Spronk, Stavros Konstantinides, Thomas Münzel, John H. Griffin, Philipp Wild, Christine Espinola-Klein, Wolfram Ruf, Katrin Schäfer
Magdalena L. Bochenek, Rajinikanth Gogiraju, Stefanie Großmann, Janina Krug, Jennifer Orth, Sabine Reyda, George S. Georgiadis, Henri M. Spronk, Stavros Konstantinides, Thomas Münzel, John H. Griffin, Philipp Wild, Christine Espinola-Klein, Wolfram Ruf, Katrin Schäfer
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Angiogenesis Vascular biology

EPCR-PAR1 biased signaling regulates perfusion recovery and neovascularization in peripheral ischemia

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Blood clot formation initiates ischemic events, but coagulation roles during postischemic tissue repair are poorly understood. The endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) regulates coagulation, as well as immune and vascular signaling, by protease activated receptors (PARs). Here, we show that endothelial EPCR-PAR1 signaling supports reperfusion and neovascularization in hindlimb ischemia in mice. Whereas deletion of PAR2 or PAR4 did not impair angiogenesis, EPCR and PAR1 deficiency or PAR1 resistance to cleavage by activated protein C caused markedly reduced postischemic reperfusion in vivo and angiogenesis in vitro. These findings were corroborated by biased PAR1 agonism in isolated primary endothelial cells. Loss of EPCR-PAR1 signaling upregulated hemoglobin expression and reduced endothelial nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. Defective angiogenic sprouting was rescued by the NO donor DETA-NO, whereas NO scavenging increased hemoglobin and mesenchymal marker expression in human and mouse endothelial cells. Vascular specimens from patients with ischemic peripheral artery disease exhibited increased hemoglobin expression, and soluble EPCR and NO levels were reduced in plasma. Our data implicate endothelial EPCR-PAR1 signaling in the hypoxic response of endothelial cells and identify suppression of hemoglobin expression as an unexpected link between coagulation signaling, preservation of endothelial cell NO bioavailability, support of neovascularization, and prevention of fibrosis.

Authors

Magdalena L. Bochenek, Rajinikanth Gogiraju, Stefanie Großmann, Janina Krug, Jennifer Orth, Sabine Reyda, George S. Georgiadis, Henri M. Spronk, Stavros Konstantinides, Thomas Münzel, John H. Griffin, Philipp Wild, Christine Espinola-Klein, Wolfram Ruf, Katrin Schäfer

×

Figure 1

Reperfusion and new vessel formation following ischemia in mice lacking EPCR in Tie2-expressing cells.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Reperfusion and new vessel formation following ischemia in mice lacking ...
(A) Representative laser Doppler perfusion images in EPCRfl/fl Tie2.Cre mice (n = 11) and EPCRfl/fl littermate controls (n = 10) immediately before and after, as well as on, day 7, day 14, day 21, and day 28 after induction of hindlimb ischemia. For technical reasons, 1 animal in each group could not be imaged at day 21. (B) Quantitative analysis of the laser signal (expressed as % of the contralateral, nonischemic site). *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001 versus values immediately after surgery; ##P < 0.01 versus EPCRfl/fl controls at the same time point; 2-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple-comparison test. (C) Representative immunofluorescence microscopy images after visualization of CD31 expression (red) in nonischemic and ischemic hindlimbs of EPCRfl/fl Tie2.Cre mice and control littermates. DAPI+ cell nuclei appear blue. Scale bar: 10 μm. (D) Quantitative analysis of CD31-immunopositive cells per muscle fiber; n = 7 biological replicates. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 versus nonischemic control muscle; #P < 0.05 versus EPCRfl/fl littermates; 2-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple-comparison test. (E) Representative bright-field images of CD31+ endothelial cells isolated from EPCRfl/fl and EPCRfl/fl Tie2.Cre littermate mice and subjected to the spheroid assay; n = 4 biological replicates per 2 experimental repeats. Scale bar: 10 μm. (F and G) Quantitative analysis of the number of sprouts (F) and total length of the sprouts (G) migrated out of the spheroids. **P < 0.01 and ****P < 0.0001 versus EPCRfl/fl littermate control mice. Data were analyzed using Student’s t test.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts