Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Immunogenic epitope panel for accurate detection of non-cross-reactive T cell response to SARS-CoV-2
Aleksei Titov, … , Victoria R. Ginanova, Grigory A. Efimov
Aleksei Titov, … , Victoria R. Ginanova, Grigory A. Efimov
Published April 7, 2022
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(9):e157699. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.157699.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article COVID-19 Clinical trials

Immunogenic epitope panel for accurate detection of non-cross-reactive T cell response to SARS-CoV-2

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic calls for more effective diagnostic tools. T cell response assessment serves as an independent indicator of prior COVID-19 exposure while also contributing to a more comprehensive characterization of SARS-CoV-2 immunity. In this study, we systematically assessed the immunogenicity of 118 epitopes with immune cells collected from multiple cohorts of vaccinated, convalescent, healthy unexposed, and SARS-CoV-2–exposed donors. We identified 75 immunogenic epitopes, 24 of which were immunodominant. We further confirmed HLA restriction for 49 epitopes and described association with more than 1 HLA allele for 14 of these. Exclusion of 2 cross-reactive epitopes that generated a response in prepandemic samples left us with a 73-epitope set that offered excellent diagnostic specificity without losing sensitivity compared with full-length antigens, and this evoked a robust cross-reactive response. We subsequently incorporated this set of epitopes into an in vitro diagnostic Corona-T-test, which achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 95% in a clinical trial. In a cohort of asymptomatic seronegative individuals with a history of prolonged SARS-CoV-2 exposure, we observed a complete absence of T cell response to our epitope panel. In combination with strong reactivity to full-length antigens, this suggests that a cross-reactive response might protect these individuals.

Authors

Aleksei Titov, Regina Shaykhutdinova, Olga V. Shcherbakova, Yana V. Serdyuk, Savely A. Sheetikov, Ksenia V. Zornikova, Alexandra V. Maleeva, Alexandra Khmelevskaya, Dmitry V. Dianov, Naina T. Shakirova, Dmitry B. Malko, Maxim Shkurnikov, Stepan Nersisyan, Alexander Tonevitsky, Ekaterina Khamaganova, Anton V. Ershov, Elena Y. Osipova, Ruslan V. Nikolaev, Dmitry E. Pershin, Viktoria A. Vedmedskia, Michael Maschan, Victoria R. Ginanova, Grigory A. Efimov

×

Figure 3

T cell response to MHC-I and MHC-II epitopes in CP and Vac.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
T cell response to MHC-I and MHC-II epitopes in CP and Vac.
(A and B) Im...
(A and B) Immunogenicity in carriers of various HLA-I (A) or HLA-II (B) alleles. For the right sides of the plots, gray bars indicate the number of tested carriers; colored bars indicate the number of responses. Colors indicate source protein, with 3-letter amino acid codes at left. Superscript numbers indicate peptide length, and the asterisk denotes a peptide with an ambiguous HLA association. The left sides of the plots show the number of responses in donors without the indicated HLA. For HLA-I, the association between the response and a single HLA allele is shown; for HLA-II, the best associations (including associations with several HLAs) are shown. Fisher’s exact test; P < 0.05 were considered significant (exact P values are specified in Supplemental Table 3). (C) Number of S protein–derived MHC-I and MHC-II epitopes recognized per individual for the CP and Vac cohorts; median and interquartile range are shown

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts