Central conducting lymphatic anomaly (CCLA) due to congenital maldevelopment of the lymphatics can result in debilitating and life-threatening disease with limited treatment options. We identified 4 individuals with CCLA, lymphedema, and microcystic lymphatic malformation due to pathogenic, mosaic variants in KRAS. To determine the functional impact of these variants and identify a targeted therapy for these individuals, we used primary human dermal lymphatic endothelial cells (HDLECs) and zebrafish larvae to model the lymphatic dysplasia. Expression of the p.Gly12Asp and p.Gly13Asp variants in HDLECs in a 2‑dimensional (2D) model and 3D organoid model led to increased ERK phosphorylation, demonstrating these variants activate the RAS/MAPK pathway. Expression of activating KRAS variants in the venous and lymphatic endothelium in zebrafish resulted in lymphatic dysplasia and edema similar to the individuals in the study. Treatment with MEK inhibition significantly reduced the phenotypes in both the organoid and the zebrafish model systems. In conclusion, we present the molecular characterization of the observed lymphatic anomalies due to pathogenic, somatic, activating KRAS variants in humans. Our preclinical studies suggest that MEK inhibition should be studied in future clinical trials for CCLA due to activating KRAS pathogenic variants.
Sarah E. Sheppard, Michael E. March, Christoph Seiler, Leticia S. Matsuoka, Sophia E. Kim, Charlly Kao, Adam I. Rubin, Mark R. Battig, Nahla Khalek, Erica Schindewolf, Nora O’Connor, Erin Pinto, Jessica R.C. Priestley, Victoria R. Sanders, Rojeen Niazi, Arupa Ganguly, Cuiping Hou, Diana Slater, Ilona J. Frieden, Thy Huynh, Joseph T. Shieh, Ian D. Krantz, Jessenia C. Guerrero, Lea F. Surrey, David M. Biko, Pablo Laje, Leslie Castelo-Soccio, Taizo A. Nakano, Kristen Snyder, Christopher L. Smith, Dong Li, Yoav Dori, Hakon Hakonarson
Usage data is cumulative from July 2023 through July 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,364 | 694 |
185 | 179 | |
Figure | 163 | 7 |
Table | 59 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 48 | 16 |
Citation downloads | 40 | 0 |
Totals | 1,859 | 896 |
Total Views | 2,755 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.