Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Acid-sensing ion channel 1a regulates the specificity of reconsolidation of conditioned threat responses
Erin E. Koffman, Charles M. Kruse, Kritika Singh, Farzaneh Sadat Naghavi, Melissa A. Curtis, Jennifer Egbo, Mark Houdi, Boren Lin, Hui Lu, Jacek Debiec, Jianyang Du
Erin E. Koffman, Charles M. Kruse, Kritika Singh, Farzaneh Sadat Naghavi, Melissa A. Curtis, Jennifer Egbo, Mark Houdi, Boren Lin, Hui Lu, Jacek Debiec, Jianyang Du
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Neuroscience

Acid-sensing ion channel 1a regulates the specificity of reconsolidation of conditioned threat responses

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Recent research on altering threat memory has focused on a reconsolidation window. During reconsolidation, threat memories are retrieved and become labile. Reconsolidation of distinct threat memories is synapse dependent, whereas the underlying regulatory mechanism of the specificity of reconsolidation is poorly understood. We designed a unique behavioral paradigm in which a distinct threat memory can be retrieved through the associated conditioned stimulus. In addition, we proposed a regulatory mechanism by which the activation of acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) strengthens the distinct memory trace associated with the memory reconsolidation to determine its specificity. The activation of ASICs by CO2 inhalation, when paired with memory retrieval, triggers the reactivation of the distinct memory trace, resulting in greater memory lability. ASICs potentiate the memory trace by altering the amygdala-dependent synaptic transmission and plasticity at selectively targeted synapses. Our results suggest that inhaling CO2 during the retrieval event increases the lability of a threat memory through a synapse-specific reconsolidation process.

Authors

Erin E. Koffman, Charles M. Kruse, Kritika Singh, Farzaneh Sadat Naghavi, Melissa A. Curtis, Jennifer Egbo, Mark Houdi, Boren Lin, Hui Lu, Jacek Debiec, Jianyang Du

×

Figure 2

CO2 inhalation during memory retrieval potentiates the effect of the anisomycin.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
CO2 inhalation during memory retrieval potentiates the effect of the ani...
(A) Schematic protocol for threat conditioning, memory retrieval, anisomycin injection, memory test–Spon Rec, and renewal. Instead of the extinction procedure, 30 minutes after retrieval, the mice were infused with 62.5 μg/μL anisomycin or saline in each side of the amygdala and then returned to their home cages followed by Spon Rec and renewal test on day 7. (B–E) Data are presented by the percentage of freezing time during the tone presentation in threat conditioning (B), retrieval (tone) (C), saline or anisomycin infusion in the amygdala (D), Spon Rec and renewal test with tones (E). (F–I) Data are presented by the percentage of freezing time during the tone presentation in threat conditioning (F), retrieval (tone) with or without CO2 (G), anisomycin infusion (H), Spon Rec, and renewal test with tones (I). Data are mean ± SEM. n = 8 mice in each group. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, by 2-tailed paired Student’s t test.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts