A hallmark of chronic bacterial infections is the long-term persistence of 1 or more pathogen species at the compromised site. Repeated detection of the same bacterial species can suggest that a single strain or lineage is continually present. However, infection with multiple strains of a given species, strain acquisition and loss, and changes in strain relative abundance can occur. Detecting strain-level changes and their effects on disease is challenging because most methods require labor-intensive isolate-by-isolate analyses, and thus, only a few cells from large infecting populations can be examined. Here, we present a population-level method for enumerating and measuring the relative abundance of strains called population multi-locus sequence typing (PopMLST). The method exploits PCR amplification of strain-identifying polymorphic loci, next-generation sequencing to measure allelic variants, and informatic methods to determine whether variants arise from sequencing errors or low-abundance strains. These features enable PopMLST to simultaneously interrogate hundreds of bacterial cells that are cultured en masse from patient samples or are present in DNA directly extracted from clinical specimens without ex vivo culture. This method could be used to detect epidemic or super-infecting strains, facilitate understanding of strain dynamics during chronic infections, and enable studies that link strain changes to clinical outcomes.
Sarah J. Morgan, Samantha L. Durfey, Sumedha Ravishankar, Peter Jorth, Wendy Ni, Duncan T. Skerrett, Moira L. Aitken, Edward F. McKone, Stephen J. Salipante, Matthew C. Radey, Pradeep K. Singh
Usage data is cumulative from April 2023 through April 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 422 | 93 |
47 | 21 | |
Figure | 86 | 0 |
Table | 38 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 13 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 22 | 0 |
Totals | 628 | 114 |
Total Views | 742 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.