Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
A population-level strain genotyping method to study pathogen strain dynamics in human infections
Sarah J. Morgan, … , Matthew C. Radey, Pradeep K. Singh
Sarah J. Morgan, … , Matthew C. Radey, Pradeep K. Singh
Published December 22, 2021
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2021;6(24):e152472. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.152472.
View: Text | PDF
Resource and Technical Advance Infectious disease Microbiology

A population-level strain genotyping method to study pathogen strain dynamics in human infections

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

A hallmark of chronic bacterial infections is the long-term persistence of 1 or more pathogen species at the compromised site. Repeated detection of the same bacterial species can suggest that a single strain or lineage is continually present. However, infection with multiple strains of a given species, strain acquisition and loss, and changes in strain relative abundance can occur. Detecting strain-level changes and their effects on disease is challenging because most methods require labor-intensive isolate-by-isolate analyses, and thus, only a few cells from large infecting populations can be examined. Here, we present a population-level method for enumerating and measuring the relative abundance of strains called population multi-locus sequence typing (PopMLST). The method exploits PCR amplification of strain-identifying polymorphic loci, next-generation sequencing to measure allelic variants, and informatic methods to determine whether variants arise from sequencing errors or low-abundance strains. These features enable PopMLST to simultaneously interrogate hundreds of bacterial cells that are cultured en masse from patient samples or are present in DNA directly extracted from clinical specimens without ex vivo culture. This method could be used to detect epidemic or super-infecting strains, facilitate understanding of strain dynamics during chronic infections, and enable studies that link strain changes to clinical outcomes.

Authors

Sarah J. Morgan, Samantha L. Durfey, Sumedha Ravishankar, Peter Jorth, Wendy Ni, Duncan T. Skerrett, Moira L. Aitken, Edward F. McKone, Stephen J. Salipante, Matthew C. Radey, Pradeep K. Singh

×

Figure 5

Heterologous DNA does not interfere with PopMLST.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Heterologous DNA does not interfere with PopMLST.
(A and B) The average ...
(A and B) The average concentration of PCR product from the 7 or 6 amplified loci after PCR using PopMLST primers for Sa (A) and Pa (B) on DNA from the indicated sources. “Human” indicates DNA extracted from tissue culture cells; “H2O” indicates ultrapure water; “Sa+ sputum” and “Pa+ sputum” indicate sputum from 3 patients with CF who were culture positive for Sa and Pa, respectively; and “Sa- sputum” and “Pa- sputum” indicate sputum from a CF patient who was culture negative for Sa and Pa. (C and D) The sum of sequence reads produced by PopMLST that mapped to 7 Sa (C) or 6 Pa (D) MLST loci shown for samples containing target and nontarget DNA from PCR reactions in A and B. Mixtures of Sa NCTC8325/CHE482 were used as positive control in A and C, and mixtures of PA14/PAO1 were used in B and D. For samples with negligible PCR amplification, more than 2 times volume of sample was used for Illumina sequencing than was used for other samples. The average and SEM of 3 separate samples are shown for Sa, Sa+ sputum, Pa, and Pa+ sputum in A–D. (E and F) 95% human DNA from tissue culture cells was added to the same mixtures of 2 control strains from Figure 2C. Bars in E show relative abundance of arc, aro, glp, gmk, pta, tpi, and yqi matching the MLST type of NCTC8325 (red) or CHE482 (blue). Bars in F show relative abundance of acs, gua, mut, nuo, pps, and trp (in order) matching the MLST type of PA14 (red) or LES (blue). Asterisk indicates the presence of an unexpected loci type (black), likely due to sequencing error.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts