Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Caveolin-1 and Sox-2 are predictive biomarkers of cetuximab response in head and neck cancer
Mehdi Bouhaddou, Rex H. Lee, Hua Li, Neil E. Bhola, Rachel A. O’Keefe, Mohammad Naser, Tian Ran Zhu, Kelechi Nwachuku, Umamaheswar Duvvuri, Adam B. Olshen, Ritu Roy, Aaron Hechmer, Jennifer Bolen, Stephen B. Keysar, Antonio Jimeno, Gordon B. Mills, Scott Vandenberg, Danielle L. Swaney, Daniel E. Johnson, Nevan J. Krogan, Jennifer R. Grandis
Mehdi Bouhaddou, Rex H. Lee, Hua Li, Neil E. Bhola, Rachel A. O’Keefe, Mohammad Naser, Tian Ran Zhu, Kelechi Nwachuku, Umamaheswar Duvvuri, Adam B. Olshen, Ritu Roy, Aaron Hechmer, Jennifer Bolen, Stephen B. Keysar, Antonio Jimeno, Gordon B. Mills, Scott Vandenberg, Danielle L. Swaney, Daniel E. Johnson, Nevan J. Krogan, Jennifer R. Grandis
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Therapeutics

Caveolin-1 and Sox-2 are predictive biomarkers of cetuximab response in head and neck cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab is the only FDA-approved oncogene-targeting therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Despite variable treatment response, no biomarkers exist to stratify patients for cetuximab therapy in HNSCC. Here, we applied unbiased hierarchical clustering to reverse-phase protein array molecular profiles from patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumors and revealed 2 PDX clusters defined by protein networks associated with EGFR inhibitor resistance. In vivo validation revealed unbiased clustering to classify PDX tumors according to cetuximab response with 88% accuracy. Next, a support vector machine classifier algorithm identified a minimalist biomarker signature consisting of 8 proteins — caveolin-1, Sox-2, AXL, STING, Brd4, claudin-7, connexin-43, and fibronectin — with expression that strongly predicted cetuximab response in PDXs using either protein or mRNA. A combination of caveolin-1 and Sox-2 protein levels was sufficient to maintain high predictive accuracy, which we validated in tumor samples from patients with HNSCC with known clinical response to cetuximab. These results support further investigation into the combined use of caveolin-1 and Sox-2 as predictive biomarkers for cetuximab response in the clinic.

Authors

Mehdi Bouhaddou, Rex H. Lee, Hua Li, Neil E. Bhola, Rachel A. O’Keefe, Mohammad Naser, Tian Ran Zhu, Kelechi Nwachuku, Umamaheswar Duvvuri, Adam B. Olshen, Ritu Roy, Aaron Hechmer, Jennifer Bolen, Stephen B. Keysar, Antonio Jimeno, Gordon B. Mills, Scott Vandenberg, Danielle L. Swaney, Daniel E. Johnson, Nevan J. Krogan, Jennifer R. Grandis

×

Figure 3

In vivo cetuximab treatment efficacy aligns with predicted PDX cetuximab response.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
In vivo cetuximab treatment efficacy aligns with predicted PDX cetuximab...
(A) Experimental endpoint average tumor volume after cetuximab treatment (normalized to vehicle) for 17 PDXs: 10 predicted sensitive (left) and 7 predicted resistant (right). We defined sensitivity as 50% or greater reduction in endpoint tumor volume relative to vehicle (black dashed line). Error bars depict the SEM. There were between 2 and 3 animals used per PDX (dots). (B) Contingency table detailing the accuracy of hierarchical clustering-based protein biomarkers (from Figure 1B) in predicting cetuximab response. 10 of 10 of implanted PDXs predicted to be sensitive responded to cetuximab (100% accuracy), whereas 5 of 7 of the PDXs that were predicted to be resistant demonstrated cetuximab resistance (71% accuracy). (C) True positive rate (TPR), true negative rate (TNR), false negative rate (FNR), and false positive rate (FPR) percentages from B. Positive was defined as sensitive to cetuximab. (D) Cramér’s V analysis assessing the strength of association between cetuximab response and biomarkers, HPV status, American Join Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, sex, or primary tumor site of the experimentally validated PDXs in A. The significance of each association (i.e., P value) was determined using a Pearson’s χ2 test. **0.001 < P < 0.01.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts