Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Differential CXCR4 expression on hematopoietic progenitor cells versus stem cells directs homing and engraftment
Sydney Felker, … , Dylan Siniard, Punam Malik
Sydney Felker, … , Dylan Siniard, Punam Malik
Published May 9, 2022
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(9):e151847. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.151847.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Stem cells Transplantation

Differential CXCR4 expression on hematopoietic progenitor cells versus stem cells directs homing and engraftment

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Gene therapy involves a substantial loss of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) during processing and homing. Intra-BM (i.b.m.) transplantation can reduce homing losses, but prior studies have not yielded promising results. We studied the mechanisms involved in homing and engraftment of i.b.m. transplanted and i.v. transplanted genetically modified (GM) human HSPC. We found that i.b.m. HSPC transplantation improved engraftment of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) but not of long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells (HSC). Mechanistically, HPC expressed higher functional levels of CXCR4 than HSC, conferring them a retention and homing advantage when transplanted i.b.m. Removing HPC and transplanting an HSC-enriched population i.b.m. significantly increased long-term engraftment over i.v. transplantation. Transient upregulation of CXCR4 on GM HSC-enriched cells, using a noncytotoxic portion of viral protein R (VPR) fused to CXCR4 delivered as a protein in lentiviral particles, resulted in higher homing and long-term engraftment of GM HSC transplanted either i.v. or i.b.m. compared with standard i.v. transplants. Overall, we show a mechanism for why i.b.m. transplants do not significantly improve long-term engraftment over i.v. transplants. I.b.m. transplantation becomes relevant when an HSC-enriched population is delivered. Alternatively, CXCR4 expression on HSC, when transiently increased using a protein delivery method, improves homing and engraftment specifically of GM HSC.

Authors

Sydney Felker, Archana Shrestha, Jeff Bailey, Devin M Pillis, Dylan Siniard, Punam Malik

×

Figure 5

Development of CXCR4 protein delivery within the lentiviral (LV) vector.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Development of CXCR4 protein delivery within the lentiviral (LV) vector....
(A) Construct design. The aa sequence of VPR and its mutant version generated is shown. VPR, a small HIV-1 accessory protein, is carried in viral particles bound to gag via residues in its central region that fold into 3 α-helices. The C-terminal domain has 6 arginine residues that potentiate nuclear localization, G2M arrest, and apoptosis. S79 phosphorylation is important for cell cycle arrest. We truncated VPR at the 78 aa and mutated VPRR77Q. W54 and Q65 interacts with DNA damage response (DDR) proteins via UNG2 and DCAF and were mutated to VPRW54R and VPRQ65R. The triple mutated and truncated VPR (VPRMT) would lack pathogenicity (residues known to be associated with VPR toxicity are highlighted in red) but allow binding to gag. VPRMT was fused to CXCR4 cDNA via the HIV-1 protease cleavage site (PCS) to generate VPRMT-CXCR4. (B) K562 cells were transduced with LVCXCR4 vector-like particles (VLP; empty vector particles lacking the vector genome) at increasing particle concentration and analyzed for CXCR4 expression using flow cytometry. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CXCR4 is listed against volume of VLP added. (C and D) A GFP-encoding LV was either packaged using standard packaging plasmids (LV, black) or packaged with VPRMT-CXCR4 plasmid in addition in order to package the CXCR protein attached to the LV capsid (LVCXCR4, red). CXCR4 expression on MPB CD34+ cells transduced with LVCXCR4 vector compared with cells transduced with the control LV vector 24 hours following gene transfer is shown. n = 4; statistical analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney U test. (E) The time course of CXCR4 expression in LVCXCR4 HSPC, normalized to that of control LV HSPC, is shown, with expression peaking at 24 hours that returns to baseline by 72 hours. Symbols represent individual MPB donors; n = 3.

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts