Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Targeting Gi/o protein–coupled receptor signaling blocks HER2-induced breast cancer development and enhances HER2-targeted therapy
Cancan Lyu, Yuanchao Ye, Maddison M. Lensing, Kay-Uwe Wagner, Ronald J. Weigel, Songhai Chen
Cancan Lyu, Yuanchao Ye, Maddison M. Lensing, Kay-Uwe Wagner, Ronald J. Weigel, Songhai Chen
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology Therapeutics

Targeting Gi/o protein–coupled receptor signaling blocks HER2-induced breast cancer development and enhances HER2-targeted therapy

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

GPCRs are highly desirable drug targets for human disease. Although GPCR dysfunction drives development and progression of many tumors, including breast cancer (BC), targeting individual GPCRs has limited efficacy as a cancer therapy because numerous GPCRs are activated. Here, we sought a new way of blocking GPCR activation in HER2+ BC by targeting a subgroup of GPCRs that couple to Gi/o proteins (Gi/o-GPCRs). In mammary epithelial cells of transgenic mouse models, and BC cell lines, HER2 hyperactivation altered GPCR expression, particularly, Gi/o-GPCR expression. Gi/o-GPCR stimulation transactivated EGFR and HER2 and activated the PI3K/AKT and Src pathways. If we uncoupled Gi/o-GPCRs from their cognate Gi/o proteins by pertussis toxin (PTx), then BC cell proliferation and migration was inhibited in vitro and HER2-driven tumor formation and metastasis were suppressed in vivo. Moreover, targeting Gi/o-GPCR signaling via PTx, PI3K, or Src inhibitors enhanced HER2-targeted therapy. These results indicate that, in BC cells, HER2 hyperactivation drives aberrant Gi/o-GPCR signaling and Gi/o-GPCR signals converge on the PI3K/AKT and Src signaling pathways to promote cancer progression and resistance to HER2-targeted therapy. Our findings point to a way to pharmacologically deactivate GPCR signaling to block tumor growth and enhance therapeutic efficacy.

Authors

Cancan Lyu, Yuanchao Ye, Maddison M. Lensing, Kay-Uwe Wagner, Ronald J. Weigel, Songhai Chen

×

Figure 6

The combined effects of lapatinib plus PI3K and Src inhibitors on HER2+ breast cancer cells and tumors.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
The combined effects of lapatinib plus PI3K and Src inhibitors on HER2+ ...
(A–C) Effects of the PI3K and Src inhibitors, saracatinib (S) and GDC0941 (G), either alone or in combination, on LPA- (A), SDF1α- (B) and EGF-stimulated (C) AKT and Src signaling in Neu cells. The blot images were assembled from multiple blots run with samples from the same experiments. (D–F) Effects of different drug combinations, saracatinib and GDC0941 (D), saracatinib and lapatinib (Lab) (E), and GDC and lapatinib (F), on Neu cell growth. The dose-dependent inhibition curves and 3D plots for different drug combinations at varying concentrations are shown on the top and bottom, respectively. The synergy score (SC) for each drug combination is also shown. (G and H) Effects of lapatinib, saracatinib, GDC0941, and their combination on Neu cell (G) and tumor (H) growth. In G, a, b, c, d, and e indicate a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05, n = 4); a represents difference from control (CT), b represents difference from lapatinib, c represents difference from lapatinib alone and GDC alone, d represents difference from saracatinib alone and GDC alone, and e represents difference from saracatinib plus GDC (Sar+GDC). In E, 1-way ANOVA, *P < 0.05, n = 5–8.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts