Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
The influence of ApoE4 on the clinical outcomes and pathophysiology of degenerative cervical myelopathy
Alexa Desimone, James Hong, Sydney T. Brockie, Wenru Yu, Alex M. Laliberte, Michael G. Fehlings
Alexa Desimone, James Hong, Sydney T. Brockie, Wenru Yu, Alex M. Laliberte, Michael G. Fehlings
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Aging Neuroscience

The influence of ApoE4 on the clinical outcomes and pathophysiology of degenerative cervical myelopathy

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of nontraumatic spinal cord injury in adults worldwide. Surgical decompression is generally effective in improving neurological outcomes and halting progression of myelopathic deterioration. However, a subset of patients experience suboptimal neurological outcomes. Given the emerging evidence that apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) allelic status influences neurodegenerative conditions, we examined whether the presence of the ApoE4 allele may account for the clinical heterogeneity of treatment outcomes in patients with DCM. Our results demonstrate that human ApoE4+ DCM patients have a significantly lower extent of improvement after decompression surgery. Functional analysis of our DCM mouse model in targeted-replacement mice expressing human ApoE4 revealed delayed gait recovery, forelimb grip strength, and hind limb mechanical sensitivity after decompression surgery, compared with their ApoE3 counterparts. This was accompanied by an exacerbated proinflammatory response resulting in higher concentrations of TNF-α, IL-6, CCL3, and CXCL9. At the site of injury, there was a significant decrease in gray matter area, an increase in the activation of microglia/macrophages, and increased astrogliosis after decompression surgery in the ApoE4 mice. Our study is the first to our knowledge to investigate the pathophysiological underpinnings of ApoE4 in DCM, which suggests a possible personalized medicine approach for the treatment of DCM in ApoE4 carriers.

Authors

Alexa Desimone, James Hong, Sydney T. Brockie, Wenru Yu, Alex M. Laliberte, Michael G. Fehlings

×

Figure 8

Exacerbated peripheral proinflammatory response 24 hours following surgical decompression in ApoE4-knockin mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Exacerbated peripheral proinflammatory response 24 hours following surgi...
Using Luminex xMAP technology, concentrations of cytokines were determined. Comparisons were made between E3-DCM and E3-Sham (indicated with + to show significance), E4-DCM and E4-Sham (indicated with # to show significance), and E3-DCM and E4-DCM (indicated with * to show significance). (A) TNF-α concentration (pg/mL) before decompression (control) and 24 hours postdecompression for all experimental groups. Before decompression, E4-DCM had significantly higher levels of TNF-α, which continued 24 hours postdecompression, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; 1-way ANOVA, Sidak’s post hoc. Additionally, E4-DCM and E4-Sham had significantly different TNF-α concentrations 24 hours postdecompression, ###P < 0.001; 1-way ANOVA, Sidak’s post hoc. (B) IL-6 concentration (pg/mL) for E4-DCM was significantly higher compared with E3-DCM 24 hours postdecompression, with each DCM group significantly different from sham counterparts, **P < 0.01, ++P < 0.01, ###P < 0.0001; 1-way ANOVA, Sidak’s post hoc. (C) CCL3 concentration (pg/mL) before decompression showed E3-DCM levels significantly higher compared with E3-Sham, +P < 0.05; 1-way ANOVA, Sidak’s post hoc. Additionally, 24 hours postdecompression E3-DCM and E4-DCM were significantly different, as well as compared with their respective sham groups, ***P < 0.001, ++++P < 0.0001, ####P < 0.0001; 1-way ANOVA, Sidak’s post hoc. (D) CXCL9 concentration (pg/mL) before decompression exhibited significant differences between E4-DCM and E4-Sham, #P < 0.05; 1-way ANOVA, Sidak’s post hoc. After decompression both DCM groups were significantly different compared with their respective shams, and E4-DCM had significantly higher levels compared with E3-DCM, **P < 0.01, +P < 0.05, ####P < 0.0001; 1-way ANOVA, Sidak’s post hoc. All data are represented as mean ± SEM.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts