Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Share this article
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article
Advertisement

Research ArticleTransplantation Open Access | 10.1172/jci.insight.149120

Donor NKG2C homozygosity contributes to CMV clearance after haploidentical transplantation

Xing-Xing Yu,1,2 Qian-Nan Shang,1,2 Xue-Fei Liu,1,2 Mei He,1 Xu-Ying Pei,1 Xiao-Dong Mo,1 Meng Lv,1 Ting-Ting Han,1 Ming-Rui Huo,1 Xiao-Su Zhao,1 Ying-Jun Chang,1 Yu Wang,1 Xiao-Hui Zhang,1 Lan-Ping Xu,1 Kai-Yan Liu,1 Xiang-Yu Zhao,1,3 and Xiao-Jun Huang1,2,3

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Yu, X. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Shang, Q. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Liu, X. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by He, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Pei, X. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Mo, X. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Lv, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Han, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Huo, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Zhao, X. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Chang, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Wang, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Zhang, X. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Xu, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Liu, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Zhao, X. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.

2Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, China.

3Beijing Engineering Lab for Cellular Therapy, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China. Phone: 86.10.88326006; Email: huangxiaojun@bjmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiang-Yu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100191, China. Phone: 86.10.88325949; Email: zhao_xy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Find articles by Huang, X. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Authorship note: XXY and QNS are co–first authors.

Published January 6, 2022 - More info

Published in Volume 7, Issue 3 on February 8, 2022
JCI Insight. 2022;7(3):e149120. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.149120.
© 2022 Yu et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published January 6, 2022 - Version history
Received: February 26, 2021; Accepted: December 21, 2021
View PDF
Abstract

CMV infection remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Several investigators have reported that adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells persistently expand during CMV reactivation. In our study, 2 cohorts were enrolled to explore the relationships among the NKG2C genotype, NKG2C+ NK cell reconstitution, and CMV infection. Multivariate analysis showed that donor NKG2C gene deletion was an independent prognostic factor for CMV reactivation and refractory CMV reactivation. Furthermore, adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells’ quantitative and qualitative reconstitution, along with their anti-CMV function after transplantation, was significantly lower in patients grafted with NKG2Cwt/del donor cells than in those grafted with NKG2Cwt/wt donor cells. At day 30 after transplantation, quantitative reconstitution of NKG2C+ NK cells was significantly lower in patients with treatment-refractory CMV reactivation than in patients without CMV reactivation and those with nonrefractory CMV reactivation. In humanized CMV-infected mice, we found that, compared with those from NKG2Cwt/del donors, adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells from NKG2Cwt/wt donors induced earlier and stronger expansion of NKG2C+ NK cells as well as earlier and stronger CMV clearance in vivo. In conclusion, donor NKG2C homozygosity contributes to CMV clearance by promoting the quantitative and qualitative reconstruction of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells after haploidentical allo-HSCT.

Graphical Abstract
graphical abstract
Introduction

Viral infections, especially CMV infections, remain important causes of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) (1, 2). The reconstitution of innate and adaptive immune cells, such as T cells and NK cells, plays an important role in controlling CMV infections (3–7).

Adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells are a subgroup of NK cells with high expression of the NKG2C-activating receptor and the absence of its inhibitory counterpart NKG2A (8). One case report showed that in a T cell–deficient infant with acute CMV infection, 80% of the NK cell population expressed NKG2C (9). In vitro data show that NKG2ChiCD57hi NK cells are highly responsive to CMV-infected macrophages only in the presence of CMV-specific antibodies; they are functionally poor effectors of natural cytotoxicity in CMV+ healthy donors (10). NKG2C receptors contribute to NKG2ChiCD57hi NK cell activation, and co–cross-linking of NKG2C enhances the CD16-mediated anti-CMV response (10). In HLA-matched transplantation or umbilical cord blood transplantation, adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells can be activated and can proliferate in response to CMV infection (11). In summary, evidence suggests that adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells might play a role in controlling CMV infection after transplantation.

Three genotypes of NKG2C (i.e., NKG2Cwt/wt, NKG2Cwt/del, and NKG2Cdel/del) have been described in humans (12), with frequencies of 63.6%, 32.4%, and 4%, respectively, in Asian and White populations (13, 14). The NKG2C genotype influences CD94/NKG2C receptor function, NKG2C surface receptor level, and NKG2C+ NK cell number in CMV+ individuals, further suggesting the receptor’s active involvement in the CMV-induced reconfiguration of the NK cell compartment (15). Vietzen et al. reported that the heterozygous NKG2C genotype is significantly associated with the frequency of CMV viremia and CMV disease after lung transplantation (16). Redondo-Pachón et al. reported that the heterozygous NKG2C genotype is associated with symptomatic CMV infection after kidney transplantation (17). Taken together, these studies suggest that a patient’s NKG2C genotype is associated with the frequency and severity of CMV infection. However, the mechanisms by which a patient’s NKG2C genotype affects CMV infection are still unknown.

Data on the influence of a donor’s NKG2C genotype on CMV infection after allo-HSCT are limited. Cao et al. found that after double umbilical cord blood (DUCB) transplantation, the combined graft could contain 0–4 functional copies of the NKG2C gene (18). The 6-month cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation was significantly lower in patients who received DUCB grafts with 3 or 4 NKG2C copies than in patients who received 2 units with 1 or 2 NKG2C copies (18). These authors also reported that CMV reactivation occurs more frequently in patients grafted with NKG2Cwt/del cord blood. Activating KIRs may have a role as, even in the absence of NKG2C expression from donors carrying a homozygous deletion of the NKG2C gene, CMV infection can cause rapid NK maturation characterized by the expansion of CD56dimNKG2A–KIR+ cells (19). Therefore, whether a donor’s NKG2C genotype affects CMV infection after transplantation merits investigation.

Previous studies reported that the quantity of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells is associated with the NKG2C genotype in healthy individuals (20). The 3 genotypes of donor-derived NK cells provide an excellent platform for exploring the impact of the donor NKG2C genotype on NKG2C+ NK cell reconstitution and CMV infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Therefore, we sought to investigate whether donor NKG2C genotype affects the reconstitution of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells and whether their reconstitution contributes to the clearance of CMV infection.

Results

Donor NKG2C homozygosity is associated with CMV clearance after allo-HSCT. There were 662 patients in the first of this study’s 2 cohorts. Table 1 presents a detailed analysis of the association between the NKG2C deletion genotype and CMV reactivation. There were 24 patients with the donor genotype NKG2Cdel/del, 223 with genotype NKG2Cwt/del, and 415 with NKG2wt/wt. The occurrence of CMV reactivation increased significantly (P = 0.039) with decreasing presence of the donor NKG2C gene (78.8% for NKG2Cwt/wt, 80.7% for NKG2Cwt/del, and 100.0% for NKG2Cdel/del). As shown in Figure 1A, the cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation after transplantation was significantly higher in the group with the NKG2Cdel/del genotype.

Cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation and refractory CMV reactivation amFigure 1

Cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation and refractory CMV reactivation among 3 NKG2C genotypes. Kaplan-Meier curves of the cumulative incidences of (A) CMV reactivation and (B) refractory CMV reactivation stratified by NKG2Cdel/del (n = 24), NKG2Cwt/del (n = 223), and NKG2Cwt/del (n = 415) in the first cohort. (C) Kaplan-Meier curves showing cumulative incidence of refractory CMV reactivation among patients without aGVHD stratified by NKG2Cdel/del (n = 11), NKG2Cwt/del (n = 103), and NKG2Cwt/del (n = 189) in the first cohort. (D) Kaplan-Meier curves for cumulative incidence of refractory CMV reactivation in the first cohort stratified by NKG2Cdel/del (n = 24), NKG2Cwt/del (n = 96), and NKG2Cwt/del (n = 96). Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) was used for these statistics.

Table 1

Patient and donor characteristics in the first retrospective cohort

Of the 24 patients with NKG2Cdel/del, 22 showed refractory CMV reactivation. The occurrence of refractory CMV reactivation increased significantly (P = 0.001) with decreasing presence of the donor NKG2C gene (57.6% for NKG2Cwt/wt, 65.9% for NKG2Cwt/del, and 91.7% for NKG2Cdel/del). As shown in Figure 1B, the cumulative incidence of refractory CMV reactivation after transplantation was significantly higher in the group with the NKG2Cdel/del genotype.

Among patients without acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), refractory CMV reactivation increased significantly (P = 0.007) with decreasing presence of the donor NKG2C gene (46.8% for NKG2Cwt/wt, 62.1% for NKG2Cwt/del, and 81.8% for NKG2Cdel/del). The cumulative incidence of refractory CMV reactivation after transplantation was significantly higher in the group with the NKG2Cdel/del genotype (Figure 1C). Among patients with aGVHD, those with full (100%) deletion of the NKG2C gene showed significantly higher refractory CMV reactivation (P = 0.041) than those with NKG2Cwt/del (69.2%) or NKG2Cwt/wt (66.7%). However, the difference was less significant between patients with the NKG2Cwt/del donor genotype and those with the NKG2Cwt/wt donor genotype.

We analyzed other variables that may affect CMV reactivation or refractory CMV reactivation, including patient age, donor age, donor type, incidence of aGVHD, and donor/recipient serology. Factors with P values of less than or equal to 0.05 in univariate analyses were included in the subsequent Cox multivariate analysis. As Table 2 shows, the NKG2C genotype remained significantly associated with CMV reactivation and refractory CMV reactivation (P = 0.048 and P = 0.004, respectively).

Table 2

Cox regression analysis of CMV infection risk in the first retrospective cohort

Among the 662 patients in the first cohort, 17 were diagnosed with CMV disease. There were 8 patients with CMV pneumonia, 6 with CMV enteritis, and 3 with CMV retinitis. Because of the small number of patients in this subset, the cumulative incidence of CMV disease (0.0%, 2.7%, 2.7%) was significantly comparable (P = 0.723) among the donor NKG2C genotypes (NKG2Cwt/wt, NKG2Cwt/del, and NKG2Cdel/del).

A total of 60 patients died of transplantation-related mortality (TRM); 88 patients relapsed after transplantation, and 61 died of relapse. No significant differences were found in the incidences of relapse or of TRM, leukemia-free survival, or overall survival among the patient groups with different donor genotypes of the NKG2C gene (NKG2Cwt/wt, NKG2Cwt/del, NKG2Cdel/del; data not shown).

To control for other factors, patients in the NKG2Cdel/del group were matched at a ratio of 1:4 (by age, sex, primary disease, blood type, HLA mismatch number, and incidence of aGVHD) with patients in the NKG2Cwt/del and NKG2Cwt/wt groups (Supplemental Table 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.149120DS1). According to the Cox multivariate analysis, the NKG2C genotype remained significantly associated with CMV reactivation and refractory CMV reactivation (P = 0.045 and P = 0.004, respectively; Supplemental Table 2). The cumulative incidence of refractory CMV reactivation after transplantation was significantly higher in the group with the NKG2Cdel/del genotype (Figure 1D). No significant differences were found in incidences of CMV disease, relapse, TRM, leukemia-free survival, or overall survival among patients with differing donor genotypes of the NKG2C gene (NKG2Cwt/wt, NKG2Cwt/del, NKG2Cdel/del; data not shown).

Donor NKG2C deletion affects the quantitative and qualitative reconstitution of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells after allo-HSCT. To investigate the impact of a donor’s NKG2C genotype on the reconstitution of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells after transplantation, we prospectively enrolled a continuous cohort of patients who underwent haploidentical transplantation. As shown in Figure 2, patients with the donor NKG2Cdel/del genotype had no reconstitution of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells. We found that the percentage of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells among the total NK cell population was significantly lower in the NKG2Cwt/del group than in the NKG2Cwt/wt group at days 30 (1.615% ± 0.3837% vs. 2.442% ± 0.3707%, P = 0.0395), 90 (6.988% ± 1.367% vs. 15.94% ± 1.846%, P = 0.0045), and 180 (5.491% ± 0.9548% vs. 16.43% ± 1.508%, P < 0.0001) after transplantation. The absolute cell counts of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells were also significantly lower in the NKG2Cwt/del group than in the NKG2Cwt/wt group at days 30 (0.9422 ± 0.2866 cells/μl vs. 2.174 ± 0.4572 cells/μl, P = 0.0231), 90 (12.73 ± 3.440 cells/μl vs. 27.55 ± 4.800 cells/μl, P = 0.0493), and 180 (12.41 ± 2.949 cells/μl vs. 33.65 ± 4.582 cells/μl, P = 0.0047) after transplantation. Notably, donor NKG2C deletion had no effect on the reconstitution of other NK cell subsets after transplantation (Supplemental Figure 1).

Quantitative and qualitative reconstitution of NKG2C+ adaptive NK cells inFigure 2

Quantitative and qualitative reconstitution of NKG2C+ adaptive NK cells in different NKG2C-genotype groups. (A) Percentages of CD107a+ and CD107a+IFN-γ+ NKG2A–NKG2C+ NK cells among K562 cells in the NKG2Cwt/del and NKG2Cwt/wt groups. Data are expressed as the mean and SEM. (B) Percentage and absolute count of NKG2A–NKG2C+ NK cells among the NKG2Cdel/del, NKG2Cwt/del, and NKG2Cwt/wt groups at days 30, 90, and 180 after allo-HSCT. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. We performed (A) a nonparametric t test with Mann-Whitney and (B) a 1-way ANOVA test.

To further investigate functional reconstitution in the NKG2Cwt/wt and NKG2Cwt/del groups, we prospectively analyzed stored patient specimens. Patients in the NKG2Cwt/del group served as a control group, matched at a 1:1 ratio (by age, sex, primary disease, blood group, number of HLA mismatches, and incidence of aGVHD) with patients in the NKG2Cwt/wt group (Supplemental Table 3). Figure 2 shows that the percentage of IFN-γ+ adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells among K562 cells was significantly lower in the NKG2Cwt/del group than in the NKG2Cwt/wt group at days 30 (13.69% ± 2.742% vs. 20.79% ± 2.388%, P = 0.0079) and 90 (23.68% ± 2.488% vs. 31.22% ± 2.548%, P = 0.0268) after transplantation. The percentage of IFN-γ+CD107a+ adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells among the total adaptive NKG2C+ NK cell population was significantly lower in the NKG2Cwt/del group than in the NKG2Cwt/wt group at days 30 (9.160% ± 2.160% vs. 14.73% ± 2.180%, P = 0.0223) and 90 (18.56% ± 2.193% vs. 26.24% ± 2.383%, P = 0.0465) after transplantation. At day 180 after transplantation, the functional reconstitution of NKG2C+ NK cells against K562 cells showed no differences between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the expression levels of CD122, DNAM-1, NKP30, NKP46, and CD25 in adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells (Supplemental Figure 2).

To detect the anti-CMV function of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells from patients with different donor NKG2C genotypes in vitro, the cytotoxicity of each patient’s NKG2C+ NK cells was evaluated against AD169-MRC-5 cells and UL40-721.221 cells. All patients showed CMV reactivation at 30 days after transplantation (n = 12). In the cocultures with UL40-721.221 cells, the percentages of CD107a+ (45.15% ± 2.634% vs. 24.59% ± 6.071%, P = 0.0152), IFN-γ+ (34.94% ± 4.420% vs. 9.133% ± 1.881%, P = 0.0022), TNF-α+ (15.12% ± 1.553% vs. 7.615% ± 1.699%, P = 0.0260), and CD107a+IFN-γ+ (25.72% ± 3.045% vs. 6.107% ± 1.757%, P = 0.0022) cells among NKG2A–NKG2C+ NK cells were significantly higher in the NKG2Cwt/wt group than in the NKG2Cwt/del group. This pattern was also observed in the cocultures with AD169-MRC-5 cells, the percentages of CD107a+ (34.02% ± 4.662% vs. 19.20% ± 4.304%, P = 0.0411), IFN-γ+ (25.72% ± 3.315% vs. 4.225% ± 1.407%, P = 0.0022), TNF-α+ (12.06% ± 2.009% vs. 6.877% ± 1.485%, P = 0.0368), and CD107a+IFN-γ+ (16.15% ± 2.977% vs. 1.535% ± 0.8312%, P = 0.0022) cells being significantly higher in the NKG2Cwt/wt group than in the NKG2Cwt/del group. Regarding the proliferation of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells in donors, the percentage of CFSE– (92.56% ± 1.394% vs. 49.08% ± 1.567%, P = 0.0079) cells among NKG2A–NKG2C+ NK cells was significantly higher in the NKG2Cwt/wt group. The proliferation index (1.572 ± 0.1013 vs. 0.2640 ± 0.01470, P = 0.0079) and the percent divided (52.08% ± 4.582% vs. 16.36% ± 1.129%, P = 0.0079) were also significantly higher in the NKG2Cwt/wt group. Furthermore, the apoptosis rate of AD169-MRC-5 cells was significantly higher in the NKG2Cwt/wt group (Annexin V: 20.73% ± 2.500% vs. 7.752% ± 0.9382%, P = 0.0022; 7AAD: 19.97% ± 2.091% vs. 10.27% ± 0.4488%, P = 0.0022). These results indicate that donor NKG2C deletion damages the anti-CMV function of donor-derived adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells after transplantation (Figure 3).

Anti-CMV functional reconstitution of NKG2C+ adaptive NK cells in differentFigure 3

Anti-CMV functional reconstitution of NKG2C+ adaptive NK cells in different NKG2C-genotype groups. PBMCs from patients who had CMV reactivation at day 30 after transplantation were cocultured with 721.221 or UL40-721.221 cells, or with MRC-5 or AD169-MRC-5 cells. Representative images of the expression of CD107a+, IFN-γ+, TNF-α+, and Perforin+ on NKG2A–NKG2C+ NK cells in the NKG2Cwt/wt group and NKG2Cwt/del group. (A) Coculture with 721.221 or UL40-721.221 cells, (B) MRC-5 or AD169-MRC-5 cells, with percentages of CD107a+, IFN-γ+, TNF-α+, Perforin+ and CD107a+IFN-γ+ NKG2A–NKG2C+ NK cells. (C) CFSE-labeled sorted donor NK cells were cocultured or not with UL40-721.221 cells. Representative images taken seven days after expression of CFSE–NKG2A–NKG2C+ NK cells in the NKG2Cwt/wt group and NKG2Cwt/del group, with percentage of CFSE–NKG2A–NKG2C+ NK cells, division index, and percent divided in the NKG2Cwt/wt and NKG2Cwt/del groups. (D) NKG2C+ NK cells were isolated from donor NK cells using NKG2C+ positive beads. Then, CFSE-labeled AD169-MRC-5 cells were used as targets at an effector-to-target ratio of 10:1 for 5 hours. Data are expressed as the mean and SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Nonparametric Student’s t test with Mann-Whitney.

Delays in quantitative reconstitution of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells foster the occurrence of refractory CMV reactivation. In the second cohort, 65 patients experienced CMV reactivation, with a median time to reactivation of 34 days after transplantation. Among these patients, 37 experienced refractory CMV reactivation.

We divided the patients into 3 groups according to reactivation status: no CMV reactivation, CMV reactivation, and refractory CMV reactivation. As shown in Figure 4, at day 30 after transplantation and before CMV reactivation detection, we found that the percentage of NKG2C+ NK cells was significantly lower in the refractory CMV group than in the no-CMV-reactivation group (1.285 ± 0.1761% vs. 3.334 ± 0.9537%, P = 0.0108) and in the CMV-reactivation group (1.285 ± 0.1761% vs. 2.865 ± 0.5941%, P = 0.0177). In addition, the absolute cell counts of NKG2C+ NK cells in the refractory CMV group were significantly lower than those in the no-CMV-reactivation (0.8915 ± 0.1652 vs. 4.716 ± 2.080 cells/μl, P = 0.0206) and CMV-reactivation groups (0.8915 ± 0.1652 vs. 1.889 ± 2.681 cells/μl, P = 0.0461). These differences among the 3 groups gradually disappeared from day 90 to day 180 after transplantation.

Poor quantitative reconstitution of NKG2C+ adaptive NK cells in patients wiFigure 4

Poor quantitative reconstitution of NKG2C+ adaptive NK cells in patients with refractory CMV reactivation at day 30 after allo-HSCT. (A) Percentage of NKG2A–NKG2C+ NK cells in the no-CMV-reactivation, CMV-reactivation, and refractory-CMV-reactivation groups at days 30, 90, and 180 after allo-HSCT. (B) Absolute count of NKG2C+ NK cells in the no-CMV-reactivation, CMV-reactivation, and refractory-CMV-reactivation groups at days 30, 90, and 180 after allo-HSCT. Data are expressed as the mean and SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. One-way ANOVA.

At day 30 after transplantation, based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, we calculated a cutoff to define the percentage of NKG2C+ NK cells that best discriminated between higher and lower risk for refractory CMV reactivation (1.374%). The incidence of refractory CMV reactivation was markedly lower in the group with a higher percentage of NKG2C+ cells (14 of 40) than in the group with a lower percentage (23 of 34). In addition, as shown in Figure 5, the cumulative incidence of refractory CMV reactivation after transplantation was significantly lower in patients with higher percentages of NKG2C+ NK cells (35% vs. 67.7%, P = 0.005). Using the Cox regression model, we found that a percentage of NKG2C+ NK cells < 1.374% at day 30 was a risk factor for the occurrence of refractory CMV reactivation (HR = 0.407, 0.209–0.794, P = 0.008). This result demonstrated that the quantitative reconstitution of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells was associated with the occurrence of refractory CMV activation.

Refractory CMV reactivation associated with reconstitution of NKG2C+ adaptiFigure 5

Refractory CMV reactivation associated with reconstitution of NKG2C+ adaptive NK cells at day 30 after allo-HSCT. Kaplan-Meier curves for cumulative incidence of refractory CMV reactivation stratified by percentage of NKG2A–NKG2C+ NK cells after allo-HSCT. A log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used for these statistics.

Correlation between the reconstitution of pentamer+ CMV-specific CD8 T cells (CMV-CTLs) and that of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells after transplantation. In vitro experiments demonstrated that NKG2C+ NK cells can regulate the expansion of CMV-CTLs (21); however, the correlation between the reconstitution of NKG2C+ NK cells and CMV-CTLs after transplantation was unknown. We therefore collected peripheral blood (PB) from 10 patients who had HLA-A*0201+ or HLA-A*-2402+ donors before viral reactivation. The samples were collected at aGVHD onset after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), at diagnosis of CMV, and at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after antiviral therapy to monitor the reconstitution of pentamer+ CD8 T cells (22) as well as NKG2C+ NK cells. In these 10 patients, we found that the percentage of NKG2C+ NK cells and the absolute number of NKG2C+ NK cells were correlated with the absolute number of CMV-CTLs after transplantation (Supplemental Figure 3, A and B). Reconstitution of CMV-CTL was delayed compared to NKG2C+ NK cell reconstitution at different time points after CMV infection (Supplemental Figure 3, C and D). However, because of the limited number of patients, we did not find differences in the reconstitution of CMV-CTLs between the NKG2Cwt/wt group and NKG2Cwt/del group (data not shown).

Adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells from NKG2C homozygous donors show a stronger ability to clear CMV infection in a humanized mouse model. To detect whether adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells from different NKG2C genotypes exhibited different expansion and CMV clearance capabilities in vivo, we established a CMV-infected humanized mouse model. There were no significant differences in aGVHD or in percentages of NK cells and NKG2A+ NK cells after NK cell infusion (Supplemental Figure 4). The genotypes of 6 donors in humanized mice were determined to exclude the influence of ADCC among different donors; this was described in the Supplemental Results and Supplemental Table 4. As shown in Figure 6, adoptively transferred NK cells had the ability to migrate to the spleen, liver, and lungs and persisted in these target organs for 14 days. In PB (26.89% ± 8.154% vs. 6.409% ± 1.662%, P = 0.0166), liver (19.13% ± 4.587% vs. 4.458% ± 1.161%, P = 0.0003), spleen (29.00% ± 8.001% vs. 3.546% ± 1.444%, P = 0.0001), and lungs (26.91% ± 10.52% vs. 5.647% ± 1.256%, P = 0.0359), the percentage of NKG2A–NKG2C+ NK cells was significantly higher in the NKG2Cwt/wt group than in the NKG2Cwt/del group (Figure 6). These findings indicated that the proliferation of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells was significantly higher in the NKG2Cwt/wt group than in the NKG2Cwt/del group. At day 14 after infusion we also found that NKG2Cwt/wt adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells effectively fought systemic CMV infection by diminishing CMV-typical lesions in target organs (Figure 6).

Stronger CMV clearance ability of NKG2Cwt/wt adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells overFigure 6

Stronger CMV clearance ability of NKG2Cwt/wt adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells over other types of NKG2C+ NK cells in a humanized mouse model. (A) Representative images taken at day 14 after infusion of the expression of NKG2A–NKG2C+ NK cells in the NKG2Cwt/wt group and NKG2Cwt/del group. The percentages of NKG2A–NKG2C+ NK cells in PB, spleen, liver, and lung in the NKG2Cwt/wt group and NKG2Cwt/del group at days 0, 7, and 14. (B) CMV pathology in the spleen, liver, and lung of animals in the NKG2Cwt/wt and NKG2Cwt/del groups at days 0, 7, and 14 (original magnification, ×40 and ×100). At least 5 mice were evaluated at each time point. Data are expressed as the mean and SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Nonparametric Student’s t test with Mann-Whitney.

In contrast, mice in the NKG2Cwt/del NK cell infusion group remained positive for CMV DNA in the spleen and liver but showed CMV clearance in the lungs. This finding suggested that in our mouse model, adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells from NKG2Cwt/wt donors exert stronger anti-CMV function compared with those from other donors. We then investigated the effect of CMV-IgG on enhanced CMV clearance in mice in the NKG2Cwt/del NK cell infusion group. As Supplemental Figure 8A shows, on day 14 after NK infusion, mice in the IgG group remained positive for CMV DNA in the spleen, liver, and lung. Mice in the NK plus IgG injection group showed CMV clearance only in the lung and no difference from mice in the NK infusion group. Moreover, the migration of NK cells showed no significant difference between mice with CMV-IgG injection and those without (Supplemental Figure 8B). Therefore, CMV-IgG showed no effect on enhanced CMV clearance by adaptive NK cells.

Discussion

We found that donor NKG2C homozygosity affected CMV clearance by promoting the quantitative and qualitative reconstitution of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells after haploidentical transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells.

We found that the NKG2C genotype affects the occurrence of refractory CMV reactivation, defined as CMV reactivation lasting over 2 weeks after transplantation. A study of kidney transplantation showed trends toward increased NKG2Cwt/del and reduced NKG2Cwt/wt frequencies associated with symptomatic CMV infection in patients monitored for CMV viremia every 2 weeks (17); these findings are consistent with our results. Another study found that patients with the NKG2Cwt/del and NKG2Cdeldel genotypes have an increased risk of HIV infection and disease progression (23); this was the first indication that the NKG2C genotype is associated with virus control. Our research supported this theory by describing a correlation between donor NKG2C genotype and CMV control after transplantation. Multivariate analysis and case-pair analysis revealed that donor NKG2C genotype was a risk factor for refractory CMV reactivation after transplantation. Vietzen et al. reported that the NKG2Cwt/wt genotype is significantly more frequent than the NKG2Cwt/del genotype in nonviremic patients than in viremic patients or in patients with CMV disease after lung transplantation (16). Our multivariate analysis supported the univariate analysis reported by Vietzen et al. Moreover, our humanized CMV mouse model showed that the NKG2Cwt/wt genotype was associated with better function of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells in reducing the incidence of CMV infection in vivo. In patients who received DUCB, owing to a limited number of patients, Cao et al. found only a trend toward increased CMV reactivation frequency associated with NKG2Cwt/del grafted cord (18). Our research supplied additional evidence of a stable link between the NKG2C genotype and the control of CMV infection.

We found that donor NKG2C homozygosity promotes quantitative and qualitative reconstitution of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells but not of other NK cell subsets. Further investigation showed that donor NKG2C genotype determined the anti-CMV function and proliferation of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells in patients experiencing CMV infection after transplantation. We also found that poor quantitative reconstitution of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells at +30 days affected the clearance of CMV infection. These data supported the hypothesis that poor reconstitution of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells would lead to the incidence of refractory CMV infection. Based on these findings and the qualitative reconstitution data, we speculate that the functions of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells influenced the clearance of CMV infection.

Furthermore, we found that adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells can be studied in a humanized mouse model, and our study of CMV-infected humanized mice yielded direct evidence that adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells can be activated and can proliferate in response to CMV stimulation. These data contributed information on the mechanism of CMV clearance, suggesting new directions for treating clinical CMV infection and disease.

Consistent with our hypothesis, adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells from NKG2C homozygous donors showed stronger CMV clearance in cohort 2. While previous studies showed that adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells expand during CMV infection (11, 24), we found evidence that, in humanized mice with CMV, donor NKG2C deletion damages the anti-CMV function of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells in vivo. Since the ability of adaptive NK cells is also influenced by HLA-E (01 or 03 alleles), IgG1 (G1m3 or G1m17) and CD16a (CD16A-V/V, CD16A-V/F or CD16A-F/F) polymorphisms, we determined the genotypes of 6 donors in humanized mice (data are shown in the supplemental material). The results showed that HLA-E IgG1 and CD16a exhibited a balanced distribution between NKG2C wild-type and heterozygous donors. The interaction of HLA-E (01 vs. 03 alleles), CMV IgG1, CD16a polymorphism, and the NKG2C genotype did not have a significant effect on the ability of adaptive NK cells; this finding calls for further exploration.

In sum, we found that donor NKG2C homozygosity was beneficial to the reconstitution and anti-CMV function of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells.

Several studies have reported that adaptive NK cells help prevent relapse in HLA-matched HCT. It has been proposed that adaptive NK cells expand preferentially in reduced-intensity recipients or HLA-matched sibling transplantation settings after CMV reactivation, and a direct association has been found between these cells’ expansion and a lower rate of leukemia relapse (25). However, the reactive rate of CMV in haploidentical allo-HSCT was more than 80%, significantly higher than that in HLA-matched HCT. Because adaptive NK cells’ expansion in response to CMV reactivation was more common in haploidentical allo-HSCT, it was difficult to determine the effect of adaptive NK cell reconstitution on relapse.

On the other hand, studies have revealed stronger graft-versus-leukemia effects with haploidentical allografts than with HLA-matched stem cell transplantation (26, 27). Compared with MHC matching, haplomatching of leukemia cells’ MHCs with recipient mouse T cells prolongs leukemic mouse survival, mainly via reduced T cell apoptosis and enhanced secretion of T cell cytokines including IFN-γ and TNF-α (26). Compared with HLA-matched HCT, our therapy strategy of allo-HSCT without T cell depletion in vitro significantly decreased leukemia relapse with the strong effects of T cells, so the association between adaptive NK cell expansion and relapse may have weakened. Such weakening might explain the lack of an observed effect in our cohort.

In conclusion, by promoting the quantitative and qualitative reconstitution of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells, donor NKG2C homozygosity contributes to the clearance of CMV infection after haploidentical allo-HSCT. Thus, considering CMV infection risk in haploidentical allo-HSCT, NKG2C homozygous donors may be preferable for hematopoietic transplantation. However, our results must be confirmed in HLA-matched sibling or unrelated allo-HSCT settings.

Methods

Patients. There were 2 patient cohorts. The first and larger cohort initially comprised 854 patients who received haploidentical transplantation between June 2012 and December 2019 for acute myeloid leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome. We excluded 192 patients from analysis: 29 who underwent prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion, 21 who died without CMV infection within 100 days after transplantation, and 142 for whom NKG2C genotyping data were lacking. Finally, 662 patients were analyzed to measure the effect of donor NKG2C genotype on CMV reactivation after transplantation. These patients’ characteristics are shown in Table 1.

To investigate the reconstitution of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells, we analyzed a prospective cohort of 74 consecutive patients with malignant hematologic disorders who underwent haploidentical transplantation at Peking University People’s Hospital between May 2016 and April 2017. Recipients and donors were CMV seropositive before transplantation. The major characteristics of these patients are shown in Table 3. Patient blood was analyzed for quantitative and qualitative reconstitution of NK cells at days 30, 90, and 180 after transplantation. To exclude the impact of CMV reactivation on 30-day adaptive NKG2C+ NK reconstitution, patients with CMV reactivation before day 30 were excluded from the cohort. We monitored the patients by measuring twice a week for CMV reactivation, performing quantitative PCR in the clinical virology laboratory. PB from 10 patients whose donors were HLA-A*0201+ or HLA-A*2402+ was collected before viral reactivation (at the onset of aGVHD), at diagnosis of CMV, and 2, 4, and 8 weeks after antiviral therapy to monitor the reconstitution of CD8 pentamer T cells (22) and NKG2C+ NK cells.

Table 3

Patient and donor characteristics in the second prospective cohort

Transplants. All patients received myeloablative conditioning (28, 29). The transplant procedure was performed as previously described (28, 29). The conditioning regimen for haploidentical transplantation was modified BUCY+ATG (thymoglobulin) consisting of cytarabine (4 g/m2 per day) intravenously on days –10 to –9; busulfan (3.2 mg/kg per day) intravenously on days –8 to –6; cyclophosphamide (CY, 1.8 g/m2 per day) intravenously on days –5 to –4; Me-CCNU (250 mg/m2) orally once on day –3; and thymoglobulin (ATG, Sang Stat; 2.5 mg/kg per day) intravenously for 4 consecutive days from day –5 to –2. All participants received fresh granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)–mobilized BM and PB cells. Ganciclovir was administered during conditioning (through day –2), and acyclovir (400 mg twice a day) was given until the discontinuation of all immunosuppressive agents. Patients also received prophylactic drugs to prevent infection by fungi.

Monitoring for CMV reactivation, preemptive therapy, and definition. After transplantation, CMV reactivation was monitored twice weekly using plasma CMV DNA testing with real-time PCR kits from PG Biotech Co., Ltd.

All patients received prophylactic acyclovir from day 1 to day 30 and ganciclovir from day –10 to day –2. Preemptive therapy with either intravenous ganciclovir or intravenous foscarnet was given when PCR results were positive for > 600 copies/mL CMV in two consecutive tests or >1000 copies/mL CMV in a single test on PB, as previously reported (31). Treatment was given for 2 weeks at the full dose and maintained for another 2 weeks until CMV DNA was cleared. Continued treatment consisted of a combination of foscarnet (60 mg/kg intravenously, twice daily) and immunoglobulin when CMV became refractory (1, 30–33).

CMV infection was diagnosed at 2 consecutive counts of CMV DNA ≥ 1 × 103 copies/mL in PB as determined by CMV PCR assay. Refractory reactivation was defined as CMV reactivation lasting over 2 weeks (31, 32, 34).

NKG2C genotyping. Donor DNA was isolated from total blood using the Puregene BloodCore kit B (Qiagen). NKG2C zygosity was assessed as previously described (12), and the patients were divided into NKG2Cdel/del, NKG2Cwt/wt, and NKG2Cwt/del groups according to donor genotype.

Cell lines. We purchased MHC class I-deficient human erythron-leukemia cell line K562 and MRC-5 human fetal lung fibroblasts from the National Infrastructure of Cell Line Resource. Xiongwen Wu (Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Department of Immunology, Wuhan, China) provided HLA-I–deficient EBV-transformed B lymphoblastoid cell line 721.221. These cell lines had been authenticated within the last 3 years using STR profiling. All experiments were performed using mycoplasma-free cells.

Cell culture and virus infection. The 721.221 and K562 cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich) complete medium. MRC-5 cells were cultured in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich) complete medium supplemented with 1% nonessential amino acids (Sigma-Aldrich).

The CMV wild-type strain AD169 (Shanghai Medial College, Fudan University) was propagated using MRC-5 cells. For the preparation of purified CMV stocks, cells were infected at a low MOI (ca. 0.05), and supernatants were harvested when the cells showed strong cytopathic effects. After the removal of cell debris by centrifugation, the supernatants were centrifuged at 20,000g for 3 hours at 10°C. The pellets were resuspended in PBS, dounced, and centrifuged through a 20% sorbitol cushion at 65,000g for 1 hour at 10°C. Each virus pellet was resuspended in PBS and stored at –80°C. Virus titers were determined using standard plaque assays (35).

Flow cytometric analyses. Acquisition was performed on an LSRFortessa instrument (BD Biosciences). Analysis was performed using FlowJo software (TreeStar; see supplemental data for antibody details).

Cytotoxicity assays. Cytotoxicity assays were performed using PBMCs and K562 cells as previously described by Zhao et al. (36).

Anti-CMV functional assays. MRC-5 fibroblasts were seeded into 24-well plates (1 × 105 per well) and grown in complete medium. Once they reached confluency, they were either infected with AD169 at an MOI of 2 for 2 hours (AD169-MRC-5) or left untreated. Cells were then incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator and monitored daily for the development of cytopathic effects (24 hours).

Then, 300 μM synthetic CMV UL40-encoded peptides (VMAPRTLFL; GL Biochem) was added to 721.221 cells (UL40-721.221) as target cells cultured at a density of 2 × 106 cells/mL in serum-free Opti-MEM (Thermo Fisher) and incubated for 16 hours at 37°C (37).

Before coculture, PBMCs were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% fetal calf serum and 1000 IU/mL IL-2 for 10–14 hours (38).

For the cytotoxicity assay, MRC-5, AD169-MRC-5, 721.221, and UL40-721.221 cells were used as targets at an effector-to-target ratio of 5:1 for 5 hours. GolgiStop (0.7 μl/mL, BD Biosciences) was added 1 hour after initiation of the assay.

For the apoptosis assay, AD169-MRC-5 cells were labeled with CFSE (BD Horizon) and used as targets at an effector-to-target ratio of 10:1 for 5 hours. NKG2C+ NK cells were isolated from NK cells using NKG2C+ positive beads (MACS, REA205). After coculture, AD169-MRC-5 cells were analyzed using an Annexin V and 7-amino-actinomycin D apoptosis detection kit (Becton Dickinson) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

In vitro proliferation of NK cells. PBMCs were obtained from healthy donors, and NK cells were sorted using an NK Cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Enriched NK cells, which included > 90%–95% CD56+CD3– cells (data not shown), were treated with IL-15 (10 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of the irradiated UL40-pulsed 721.221 cell line. Purified NK cells were stained with CFSE and monitored for 7 days to examine their proliferation ability. The division index and proliferation index were calculated by the FlowJo Proliferation Platform. The division index is the average number of cell divisions that a cell in the original population has undergone. The calculation includes cells that never divided. The proliferation index is the total number of divisions divided by the number of cells that initiated division. The proliferation index only considers the cells that underwent at least one division; that is, only responding cells are reflected in the proliferation index.

CMV-infected humanized mice and intravenous injection of in vitro–expanded NK cells. Fresh PBMCs (2 × 107 cells) were incubated in a T75 culture flask with equal numbers of irradiated mbIL21/41BBL-K562 cells and 1000 IU/mL human IL-2 in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with autologous serum. The medium was replaced daily with fresh medium and IL-2. One week after expansion, the NK cells were transferred into T175 culture flasks. At two weeks after expansion, the expanded NK cells were transferred into a culture bag. At the beginning of the expansion process, PBMCs were stimulated once with K562-mbIL21-41BBL feeder cells.

Six- to eight-week-old NOD-Prkdcscid IL2Rγcnull mice (NPG) were obtained from the Nanjing Model Animal Center. They were sublethally irradiated (150 cGy X-irradiation), and G-CSF–mobilized PBSCs (1 × 106) obtained from CMV-seropositive donors at 0 weeks were injected via the tail vein. At 2 weeks after engraftment, mice were injected i.p. with 1 × 106 AD169-MRC-5 cells (39, 40). At 4 weeks after engraftment, mice received adoptive transfers of in vitro-expanded NK cells (1 × 107) and were injected i.p. with 50,000 U of IL-2 every other day after NK cell infusion. To investigate the effect of CMV-IgG on CMV clearance, mice were injected with CMV-IgG (40 U; Taibang) i.p. twice a week. To assess the expansion of NK cells, mice were killed at days 0, 7, and 14 after NK cell infusion. The spleen, liver, and lungs were harvested and analyzed for CMV DNA by in situ hybridization using a CMV probe (BOND CMV Probe, PB0614). Mice received adoptive transfers of in vitro–expanded NK cells from 6 healthy donors, 3 individual donors from each genetic group (NKG2Cwt/del, NKG2Cwt/wt), and transfer was repeated 3 times. More than 5 mice per group were harvested at each time point.

Statistics. Differences in categorical variables between groups were evaluated using χ2 tests or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were compared using a nonparametric test (Mann-Whitney test for 2 groups and Kruskal-Wallis test for multiple groups). Correlations were analyzed via nonparametric correlation analysis. The associations among the NKG2C genotype, reconstitution of adaptive NKG2C+ NK cells, and refractory CMV reactivation were analyzed with a cumulative incidence curve in a competing risk setting, with nonrelapse mortality as a competing event. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess the proportional hazards assumption and to test interaction terms with covariates. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0, GraphPad Prism 6.0 and R software. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Study approval. All patients and donors provided written informed consent, and the Institutional Review Board of the Peking University Institute of Hematology approved the study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02978274). Mouse experiments were performed in accordance with the Animal Welfare Act and approved by the Peking University People’s Hospital Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Author contributions

XXY conducted the in vitro experiments and flow cytometry assays. QNS conducted the animal experiments and performed the statistical analyses; XFL and MH facilitated in vitro and animal experiments; XYP, XDM, ML, TTH, MRH, XSZ, YJC, YW, XHZ, LPX, and KYL performed the clinical examination; XJH and XYZ designed the study and interpreted the data; XJH, XYZ, and XXY wrote the manuscript. QNS revised the manuscript. XXY is listed before QNS because of XXY’s role in writing and manuscript and QNS’s role in revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

Acknowledgments

We thank Norbert Schmitz (Department of Medicine A, University Hospital Münster) for his help in revising and discussing the manuscript. We also thank Chuan-Yu Zhang (iCELL Co., Ltd.; Beijing Engineering Laboratory for Cellular Therapy) for his help in the organization of the clinical-grade expansion of NK cells. This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 81670166, 81870140, 82070184, and 81370666), Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 81621001), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant 2017YFA0104500), and the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (grant Z171100001017098). It was further supported through the Project of Health Collaborative Innovation of Guangzhou City (grant 201704020214); the Scientific Research Foundation for Capital Medicine Development (grant 2018-2-4084) and the Peking University People’s Hospital Research and Development Funds (grant RDX2019-14; RDL2021-01) also supported the project. We thank the core facilities at the Peking University Institute of Hematology for sample collection.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Copyright: © 2022, Yu et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(3):e149120.https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.149120.

References
  1. Liu J, et al. Patients with refractory cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation are at high risk for CMV disease and non-relapse mortality. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(12):1121.e9–1121.15.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Moss P, Rickinson A. Cellular immunotherapy for viral infection after HSC transplantation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5(1):9–20.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Drylewicz J, et al. Rapid reconstitution of CD4 T cells and NK cells protects against CMV-reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. J Transl Med. 2016;14(1):230.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Pei XY, et al. Cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell transfer for refractory cytomegalovirus infection after haploidentical stem cell transplantation: the quantitative and qualitative immune recovery for cytomegalovirus. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(8):945–956.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Yu X, et al. Rapid reconstitution of NK1 cells after allogeneic transplantation is associated with a reduced incidence of graft-versus-host disease. Sci China Life Sci. 2018;61(8):902–911.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Zhao X, et al. First-line therapy with donor-derived human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific T cells reduces persistent HCMV infection by promoting antiviral immunity after allogenic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;70(7):1429–1437.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Zhao XY, et al. Recipient-donor KIR ligand matching prevents CMV reactivation post-haploidentical T cell-replete transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2017;177(5):766–781.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Geary CD, Sun JC. Memory responses of natural killer cells. Semin Immunol. 2017;31:11–19.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Kuijpers TW, et al. Human NK cells can control CMV infection in the absence of T cells. Blood. 2008;112(3):914–915.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Wu Z, et al. Human cytomegalovirus-induced NKG2Chi CD57hi natural killer cells are effectors dependent on humoral antiviral immunity. J Virol. 2013;87(13):7717–7725.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Foley B, et al. Cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic transplantation promotes a lasting increase in educated NKG2C+ natural killer cells with potent function. Blood. 2012;119(11):2665–2674.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Moraru M, et al. Assessment of copy-number variation in the NKG2C receptor gene in a single-tube and characterization of a reference cell panel, using standard polymerase chain reaction. Tissue Antigens. 2012;80(2):184–187.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Hikami K, et al. Variations of human killer cell lectin-like receptors: common occurrence of NKG2-C deletion in the general population. Genes Immun. 2003;4(2):160–167.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Miyashita R, et al. Molecular genetic analyses of human NKG2C (KLRC2) gene deletion. Int Immunol. 2004;16(1):163–168.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Muntasell A, et al. NKG2C zygosity influences CD94/NKG2C receptor function and the NK-cell compartment redistribution in response to human cytomegalovirus. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43(12):3268–3278.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Vietzen H, et al. NKG2C deletion is a risk factor for human cytomegalovirus viremia and disease after lung transplantation. J Infect Dis. 2017;217(5):802–806.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Redondo-Pachón D, et al. Adaptive NKG2C+ NK cell response and the risk of cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients. J Immunol. 2017;198(1):94–101.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Cao K, et al. Donor NKG2C copy number: an independent predictor for CMV reactivation after double cord blood transplantation. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2444.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Della Chiesa M, et al. Human cytomegalovirus infection promotes rapid maturation of NK cells expressing activating killer Ig-like receptor in patients transplanted with NKG2C–/– umbilical cord blood. J Immunol. 2014;192(4):1471–1479.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Goodier MR, et al. Rapid NK cell differentiation in a population with near-universal human cytomegalovirus infection is attenuated by NKG2C deletions. Blood. 2014;124(14):2213–2222.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Grutza R, et al. NKG2Cpos NK cells regulate the expansion of cytomegalovirus-specific CD8 T cells. J Immunol. 2020;204(11):2910–2917.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Zhao XY, et al. First-line therapy with donor-derived human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific T cells reduces persistent HCMV infection by promoting antiviral immunity after allogenic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70(7):1429–1437.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Thomas R, et al. NKG2C deletion is a risk factor of HIV infection. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2012;28(8):844–851.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Lopez-Vergès S, et al. Expansion of a unique CD57+NKG2Chi natural killer cell subset during acute human cytomegalovirus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(36):14725–14732.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Cichocki F, et al. CD56dimCD57+NKG2C+ NK cell expansion is associated with reduced leukemia relapse after reduced intensity HCT. Leukemia. 2016;30(2):456–463.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Guo H, et al. Dynamic immune profiling identifies the stronger graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects with haploidentical allografts compared to HLA-matched stem cell transplantation. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18(5):1172–1185.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Yu S, et al. Haploidentical transplantation might have superior graft-versus-leukemia effect than HLA-matched sibling transplantation for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: a prospective multicentre cohort study. Leukemia. 2020;34(5):1433–1443.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Wang Y, et al. Haploidentical transplant for myelodysplastic syndrome: registry-based comparison with identical sibling transplant. Leukemia. 2016;30(10):2055–2063.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Qin X, et al. Quantitative chimerism: an independent acute leukemia prognosis indicator following allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49(10):1269–1277.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Feuchtinger T, et al. Adoptive transfer of pp65-specific T cells for the treatment of chemorefractory cytomegalovirus disease or reactivation after haploidentical and matched unrelated stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2010;116(20):4360–4367.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Liu J, et al. Poor CMV-specific CD8+ T central memory subset recovery at early stage post-HSCT associates with refractory and recurrent CMV reactivation. J Infect. 2016;73(3):261–270.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Ljungman P, et al. Definitions of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(8):1094–1097.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. El Chaer F, et al. How I treat resistant cytomegalovirus infection in hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients. Blood. 2016;128(23):2624–2636.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Ljungman P, et al. Definitions of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant patients for use in clinical trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;64(1):87–91.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Rölle A, et al. IL-12–producing monocytes and HLA-E control HCMV-driven NKG2C+ NK cell expansion. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(12):5305–5316.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Zhao XY, et al. Donor and host coexpressing KIR ligands promote NK education after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood Adv. 2019;3(24):4312–4325.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Hammer Q, et al. Peptide-specific recognition of human cytomegalovirus strains controls adaptive natural killer cells. Nat Immunol. 2018;19(5):453–463.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Zhao XY, et al. Recipient expression of ligands for donor inhibitory KIRs enhances NK-cell function to control leukemic relapse after haploidentical transplantation. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45(8):2396–2408.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Hakki M, et al. HCMV infection of humanized mice after transplantation of G-CSF–mobilized peripheral blood stem cells from HCMV-seropositive donors. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20(1):132–135.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Smith MS, et al. G-CSF reactivates human cytomegalovirus in a latently infected humanized mouse model. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;8(3):284–291.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (January 6, 2022): In-Press Preview
  • Version 2 (February 8, 2022): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Share this article
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts