Recent advances in proteomic technologies have made high-throughput profiling of low-abundance proteins in large epidemiological cohorts increasingly feasible. We investigated whether aptamer-based proteomic profiling could identify biomarkers associated with future development of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) beyond known risk factors. We identified dozens of markers with highly significant associations with future T2DM across 2 large longitudinal cohorts (n = 2839) followed for up to 16 years. We leveraged proteomic, metabolomic, genetic, and clinical data from humans to nominate 1 specific candidate to test for potential causal relationships in model systems. Our studies identified functional effects of aminoacylase 1 (ACY1), a top protein association with future T2DM risk, on amino acid metabolism and insulin homeostasis in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, a loss-of-function variant associated with circulating levels of the biomarker WAP, Kazal, immunoglobulin, Kunitz, and NTR domain–containing protein 2 (WFIKKN2) was, in turn, associated with fasting glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and HOMA-IR measurements in humans. In addition to identifying potentially novel disease markers and pathways in T2DM, we provide publicly available data to be leveraged for insights about gene function and disease pathogenesis in the context of human metabolism.
Debby Ngo, Mark D. Benson, Jonathan Z. Long, Zsu-Zsu Chen, Ruiqi Wang, Anjali K. Nath, Michelle J. Keyes, Dongxiao Shen, Sumita Sinha, Eric Kuhn, Jordan E. Morningstar, Xu Shi, Bennet D. Peterson, Christopher Chan, Daniel H. Katz, Usman A. Tahir, Laurie A. Farrell, Olle Melander, Jonathan D. Mosley, Steven A. Carr, Ramachandran S. Vasan, Martin G. Larson, J. Gustav Smith, Thomas J. Wang, Qiong Yang, Robert E. Gerszten
Usage data is cumulative from October 2023 through October 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 888 | 896 |
96 | 132 | |
Figure | 246 | 18 |
Table | 66 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 76 | 46 |
Citation downloads | 32 | 0 |
Totals | 1,404 | 1,092 |
Total Views | 2,496 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.