Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Clinical and laboratory evaluation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with high-titer convalescent plasma
Michele L. Donato, … , Ernest Richards, David S. Perlin
Michele L. Donato, … , Ernest Richards, David S. Perlin
Published February 11, 2021
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2021;6(6):e143196. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.143196.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article COVID-19

Clinical and laboratory evaluation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with high-titer convalescent plasma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Here, we report on a phase IIa study to determine the intubation rate, survival, viral clearance, and development of endogenous Abs in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia treated with convalescent plasma (CCP) containing high levels of neutralizing anti–SARS-CoV-2 Abs. Radiographic and laboratory evaluation confirmed all 51 treated patients had COVID-19 pneumonia. Fresh or frozen CCP from donors with high titers of neutralizing Abs was administered. The nonmechanically ventilated patients (n = 36) had an intubation rate of 13.9% and a 30-day survival rate of 88.9%, and the overall survival rate for a comparative group based on network data was 72.5% (1625/2241). Patients had negative nasopharyngeal swab rates of 43.8% and 73.0% on days 10 and 30, respectively. Patients mechanically ventilated had a day-30 mortality rate of 46.7%; the mortality rate for a comparative group based on network data was 71.0% (369/520). All evaluable patients were found to have neutralizing Abs on day 3 (n = 47), and all but 1 patient had Abs on days 30 and 60. The only adverse event was a mild rash. In this study on patients with COVID-19 disease, we show therapeutic use of CCP was safe and conferred transfer of Abs, while preserving endogenous immune response.

Authors

Michele L. Donato, Steven Park, Melissa Baker, Robert Korngold, Alison Morawski, Xue Geng, Ming Tan, Andrew Ip, Stuart Goldberg, Scott Rowley, Kar Chow, Emily Brown, Joshua Zenreich, Phyllis McKiernan, Kathryn Buttner, Anna Ullrich, Laura Long, Rena Feinman, Andrea Ricourt, Marlo Kemp, Mariefel Vendivil, Hyung Suh, Bindu Balani, Cristina Cicogna, Rani Sebti, Abdulla Al-Khan, Steven Sperber, Samit Desai, Stacey Fanning, Danit Arad, Ronaldo Go, Elizabeth Tam, Keith Rose, Sean Sadikot, David Siegel, Martin Gutierrez, Tatyana Feldman, Andre Goy, Andrew Pecora, Noa Biran, Lori Leslie, Alfred Gillio, Sarah Timmapuri, Michele Boonstra, Sam Singer, Sukhdeep Kaur, Ernest Richards, David S. Perlin

×

Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 469 198
PDF 163 12
Figure 137 1
Table 141 0
Citation downloads 87 0
Totals 997 211
Total Views 1,208
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts