Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Modulation of the effects of class Ib antiarrhythmics on cardiac NaV1.5-encoded channels by accessory NaVβ subunits
Wandi Zhu, Wei Wang, Paweorn Angsutararux, Rebecca L. Mellor, Lori L. Isom, Jeanne M. Nerbonne, Jonathan R. Silva
Wandi Zhu, Wei Wang, Paweorn Angsutararux, Rebecca L. Mellor, Lori L. Isom, Jeanne M. Nerbonne, Jonathan R. Silva
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cardiology Therapeutics

Modulation of the effects of class Ib antiarrhythmics on cardiac NaV1.5-encoded channels by accessory NaVβ subunits

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Native myocardial voltage-gated sodium (NaV) channels function in macromolecular complexes comprising a pore-forming (α) subunit and multiple accessory proteins. Here, we investigated the impact of accessory NaVβ1 and NaVβ3 subunits on the functional effects of 2 well-known class Ib antiarrhythmics, lidocaine and ranolazine, on the predominant NaV channel α subunit, NaV1.5, expressed in the mammalian heart. We showed that both drugs stabilized the activated conformation of the voltage sensor of domain-III (DIII-VSD) in NaV1.5. In the presence of NaVβ1, the effect of lidocaine on the DIII-VSD was enhanced, whereas the effect of ranolazine was abolished. Mutating the main class Ib drug-binding site, F1760, affected but did not abolish the modulation of drug block by NaVβ1/β3. Recordings from adult mouse ventricular myocytes demonstrated that loss of Scn1b (NaVβ1) differentially affected the potencies of lidocaine and ranolazine. In vivo experiments revealed distinct ECG responses to i.p. injection of ranolazine or lidocaine in WT and Scn1b-null animals, suggesting that NaVβ1 modulated drug responses at the whole-heart level. In the human heart, we found that SCN1B transcript expression was 3 times higher in the atria than ventricles, differences that could, in combination with inherited or acquired cardiovascular disease, dramatically affect patient response to class Ib antiarrhythmic therapies.

Authors

Wandi Zhu, Wei Wang, Paweorn Angsutararux, Rebecca L. Mellor, Lori L. Isom, Jeanne M. Nerbonne, Jonathan R. Silva

×

Figure 1

Class Ib antiarrhythmics lidocaine and ranolazine alter NaV1.5 VSD conformations.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Class Ib antiarrhythmics lidocaine and ranolazine alter NaV1.5 VSD confo...
(A) Chemical structures of lidocaine and ranolazine. (B) Voltage dependence of the steady-state fluorescence (F-V curves) from the 4 domains (DI-V215C, DII-S805C, DIII-M1296C, DIV-S1618C) of NaV1.5 before and after 10 mM lidocaine. Lidocaine was used at 10 mM to produce a robust tonic block (TB). In the presence of lidocaine, fluorescence was measured when TB reached more than 70%. Lidocaine induced a hyperpolarizing shift in both the DIII and DIV F-V curves. (C) F-V curves from the 4 domains of NaV1.5 before and after 4 mM ranolazine. Similar to the lidocaine experiment (B), in the presence of ranolazine, the fluorescence was measured when TB reached more than 70%. Ranolazine caused a hyperpolarizing shift in the DIII but not in the DIV F-V curve. (D) Schematic showing effects of lidocaine and ranolazine on the DIII- and DIV-VSDs; note that each VSD is represented by a single S4 segment for clarity. Lidocaine caused both the DIII and the DIV VSDs to stabilize in the activated conformation, whereas ranolazine only stabilized the DIII-VSD in the activated position. Each data set represents mean ± SEM values from 4–6 cells.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts