Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
NOGOB receptor–mediated RAS signaling pathway is a target for suppressing proliferating hemangioma
Wenquan Hu, Zhong Liu, Valerie Salato, Paula E. North, Joyce Bischoff, Suresh N. Kumar, Zhi Fang, Sujith Rajan, M. Mahmood Hussain, Qing R. Miao
Wenquan Hu, Zhong Liu, Valerie Salato, Paula E. North, Joyce Bischoff, Suresh N. Kumar, Zhi Fang, Sujith Rajan, M. Mahmood Hussain, Qing R. Miao
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Angiogenesis Vascular biology

NOGOB receptor–mediated RAS signaling pathway is a target for suppressing proliferating hemangioma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Infantile hemangioma is a vascular tumor characterized by the rapid growth of disorganized blood vessels followed by slow spontaneous involution. The underlying molecular mechanisms that regulate hemangioma proliferation and involution still are not well elucidated. Our previous studies reported that NOGOB receptor (NGBR), a transmembrane protein, is required for the translocation of prenylated RAS from the cytosol to the plasma membrane and promotes RAS activation. Here, we show that NGBR was highly expressed in the proliferating phase of infantile hemangioma, but its expression decreased in the involuting phase, suggesting that NGBR may have been involved in regulating the growth of proliferating hemangioma. Moreover, we demonstrate that NGBR knockdown in hemangioma stem cells (HemSCs) attenuated growth factor–stimulated RAS activation and diminished the migration and proliferation of HemSCs, which is consistent with the effects of RAS knockdown in HemSCs. In vivo differentiation assay further shows that NGBR knockdown inhibited blood vessel formation and adipocyte differentiation of HemSCs in immunodeficient mice. Our data suggest that NGBR served as a RAS modulator in controlling the growth and differentiation of HemSCs.

Authors

Wenquan Hu, Zhong Liu, Valerie Salato, Paula E. North, Joyce Bischoff, Suresh N. Kumar, Zhi Fang, Sujith Rajan, M. Mahmood Hussain, Qing R. Miao

×

Figure 4

NGBR knockdown decreases the migration of HemSCs in vitro.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
NGBR knockdown decreases the migration of HemSCs in vitro.
(A) NGBR knoc...
(A) NGBR knockdown did not affect the cell viability of HemSCs. AO/EB staining was used for determining apoptotic HemSCs after treatment with siControl and siNGBR. The quantitative results show the average percentage of apoptotic cells (n = 3), 3 repeats. (B) The representative wound-healing images of HemSCs transfected with siControl or ​siNGBR at indicated times. Each condition was photographed in 4 separate fields. The quantitative results are presented as a bar graph (right). *P < 0.05 vs. control (siControl) cells (n = 3), 3 repeats. (C) Transwell migration assay of HemSCs transfected with either siControl or ​siNGBR with/without EGF, FGF2, and VEGF stimulation. The representative images of migrated cells are shown in the left panel. The bar graph in the right panel shows the quantitative numbers of migratory cells evaluated by ImageJ software. *P < 0.05 vs. control (siControl) cells. #P < 0.05 vs. control (siControl) cells treated with EGF, FGF2, and VEGF (n = 3), 3 repeats. (D) Scratch wound healing assay shows reduced migration of either HRAS- or KRAS-deficient HemSCs. HemSCs transfected with siControl, siHRAS, or siKRAS were subjected to scratch wound healing assay. The representative images of wound healing are shown at indicated times. The bar graph in the right panel represents the percentage of the cell-covered area determined from each time point. *P < 0.05 vs. control (siControl) cells (n = 3), 3 repeats. (E) Transwell migration assay of HemSCs transfected with siControl, siHRAS, or siKRAS. Cell migration was determined using Corning Transwell chambers. The results presented are an average of migrated cell numbers in 4 random microscopic fields from 3 independent experiments. *P < 0.05 vs. control (siControl) cells (n = 3). Statistical analyses: 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test (A, B, D, and E) and 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test (C); data are expressed as mean ± SEM. NGBR, NOGOB receptor; HemSCs, hemangioma stem cells; AO/EB, acridine orange/ethidium bromide; siControl, control siRNA; siNGBR, NGBR siRNA.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts