Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2020;5(24):e140399. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.140399.
Abstract
Small noncoding RNAs, miRNAs (miRNAs), are emerging as important modulators in the pathogenesis of kidney disease, with potential as biomarkers of kidney disease onset, progression, or therapeutic efficacy. Bulk tissue small RNA-sequencing (sRNA-Seq) and microarrays are widely used to identify dysregulated miRNA expression but are limited by the lack of precision regarding the cellular origin of the miRNA. In this study, we performed cell-specific sRNA-Seq on tubular cells, endothelial cells, PDGFR-β+ cells, and macrophages isolated from injured and repairing kidneys in the murine reversible unilateral ureteric obstruction model. We devised an unbiased bioinformatics pipeline to define the miRNA enrichment within these cell populations, constructing a miRNA catalog of injury and repair. Our analysis revealed that a significant proportion of cell-specific miRNAs in healthy animals were no longer specific following injury. We then applied this knowledge of the relative cell specificity of miRNAs to deconvolute bulk miRNA expression profiles in the renal cortex in murine models and human kidney disease. Finally, we used our data-driven approach to rationally select macrophage-enriched miR-16-5p and miR-18a-5p and demonstrate that they are promising urinary biomarkers of acute kidney injury in renal transplant recipients.
Authors
Katie L. Connor, Oliver Teenan, Carolynn Cairns, Victoria Banwell, Rachel A.B. Thomas, Julie Rodor, Sarah Finnie, Riinu Pius, Gillian M. Tannahill, Vishal Sahni, Caroline O.S. Savage, Jeremy Hughes, Ewen M. Harrison, Robert B. Henderson, Lorna P. Marson, Bryan R. Conway, Stephen J. Wigmore, Laura Denby
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 483 | 157 |
| 64 | 53 | |
| Figure | 161 | 16 |
| Table | 70 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 37 | 3 |
| Citation downloads | 38 | 0 |
| Totals | 853 | 229 |
| Total Views | 1,082 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
