Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Lipoproteins LDL versus HDL as nanocarriers to target either cancer cells or macrophages
Tarik Hadi, … , Carmen Garrido, Frederic Lirussi
Tarik Hadi, … , Carmen Garrido, Frederic Lirussi
Published November 30, 2020
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2020;5(24):e140280. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.140280.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology Therapeutics

Lipoproteins LDL versus HDL as nanocarriers to target either cancer cells or macrophages

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

In this work, we have explored natural unmodified low- and high-density lipoproteins (LDL and HDL, respectively) as selective delivery vectors in colorectal cancer therapy. We show in vitro in cultured cells and in vivo (NanoSPECT/CT) in the CT-26 mice colorectal cancer model that LDLs are mainly taken up by cancer cells, while HDLs are preferentially taken up by macrophages. We loaded LDLs with cisplatin and HDLs with the heat shock protein-70 inhibitor AC1LINNC, turning them into a pair of “Trojan horses” delivering drugs selectively to their target cells as demonstrated in vitro in human colorectal cancer cells and macrophages, and in vivo. Coupling of the drugs to lipoproteins and stability was assessed by mass spectometry and raman spectrometry analysis. Cisplatin vectorized in LDLs led to better tumor growth suppression with strongly reduced adverse effects such as renal or liver toxicity. AC1LINNC vectorized into HDLs induced a strong oxidative burst in macrophages and innate anticancer immune response. Cumulative antitumor effect was observed for both drug-loaded lipoproteins. Altogether, our data show that lipoproteins from patient blood can be used as natural nanocarriers allowing cell-specific targeting, paving the way toward more efficient, safer, and personalized use of chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic drugs in cancer.

Authors

Tarik Hadi, Christophe Ramseyer, Thomas Gautier, Pierre-Simon Bellaye, Tatiana Lopez, Antonin Schmitt, Sarah Foley, Semen Yesylevskyy, Thibault Minervini, Romain Douhard, Lucile Dondaine, Lil Proukhnitzky, Samir Messaoudi, Maeva Wendremaire, Mathieu Moreau, Fabrice Neiers, Bertrand Collin, Franck Denat, Laurent Lagrost, Carmen Garrido, Frederic Lirussi

×

Figure 1

Pharmacokinetics parameters of LDL and HDL in mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Pharmacokinetics parameters of LDL and HDL in mice.
(A and B) Balb/c mic...
(A and B) Balb/c mice were injected i.v. with LDL-Bodipy (A) or HDL-Bodipy (B), 100 μL lipoprotein (1 mM cholesterol), 5 mice per group. A total of 100 μL of blood sample was dragged at the indicated times. Lipoproteins were extracted by ultracentrifugation, and Bodipy-bound HDL/LDL concentration was assessed by fluorimetry. Values are represented as mean ± SEM. Mean PK parameters for each condition were compared in order to sort out any differences. (C and D) In addition to NCA, a population PK approach was used. This approach allows, with a limited number of samples per animal, to determine typical and individual compartmental PK parameters (ka, Cl/F, distribution volume of central compartment, intercompartmental clearances, and distribution volume of peripheral compartments) and the interindividual variabilities associated to those PK parameters. Data are presented as correlation between the predicted and observed concentrations of HDL (C) and LDL (D) using this approach. ka, constant of absorption rate; Cl, clearance; F, bioavailability.

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts