Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
CD19-targeted CAR regulatory T cells suppress B cell pathology without GvHD
Yuki Imura, Makoto Ando, Taisuke Kondo, Minako Ito, Akihiko Yoshimura
Yuki Imura, Makoto Ando, Taisuke Kondo, Minako Ito, Akihiko Yoshimura
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Therapeutics

CD19-targeted CAR regulatory T cells suppress B cell pathology without GvHD

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) play essential roles in maintaining immunological self-tolerance and preventing autoimmunity. The adoptive transfer of antigen-specific Tregs has been expected to be a potent therapeutic method for autoimmune diseases, severe allergy, and rejection in organ transplantation. However, effective Treg therapy has not yet been established because of the difficulty in preparing a limited number of antigen-specific Tregs. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have been shown to be a powerful therapeutic method for treating B cell lymphomas, but application of CAR to Treg-mediated therapy has not yet been established. Here, we generated CD19-targeted CAR (CD19-CAR) Tregs from human PBMCs (hPBMCs) and optimized the fraction of the Treg source as CD4+CD25+CD127loCD45RA+CD45RO–. CD19-CAR Tregs could be expanded in vitro while maintaining Treg properties, including high expression of the latent form of TGF-β. CD19-CAR Tregs suppressed IgG antibody production and differentiation of B cells via a TGF-β–dependent mechanism. Unlike conventional CD19-CAR CD8+ T cells, CD19-CAR Tregs suppressed antibody production in immunodeficient mice that were reconstituted with hPBMCs, reducing the risk of graft-versus-host disease. Therefore, the adoptive transfer of CD19-CAR Tregs may provide a novel therapeutic method for treating autoantibody-mediated autoimmune diseases.

Authors

Yuki Imura, Makoto Ando, Taisuke Kondo, Minako Ito, Akihiko Yoshimura

×

Figure 4

CD19-targeted CAR Tregs efficiently suppress B cells and antibody production.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
CD19-targeted CAR Tregs efficiently suppress B cells and antibody produc...
Primary human B cells were stimulated with anti-IgM and anti-CD40 antibodies in the presence of IL-21. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of CellTrace Violet dilution of CellTrace Violet–labeled primary human B cells 3 days after coculture with CD19-CAR Tregs or polyclonal Tregs at ratios of 1:0.1 and 1:1 (B cells/Tregs) (n = 3). The fraction of CellTrace Violetlo B cells in the absence of drug and CD19-CAR Tregs is shown as 100% in the right panels. (B) Total IgG antibody levels produced by B cells and flow cytometric analysis of differentiated B cells (CD4–FVD–IgD–CD38+) 7 days after coculture with CD19-CAR Tregs or polyclonal Tregs at ratios of 1:0.1, 1:0.3, and 1:1 (B cells/Tregs) (n = 3–4). HD, healthy donor. (C) Total IgA antibody levels after coculture (n = 3). (A and B) Data are representative of independent experiments using samples from 2 healthy donors. (C) Data were collected using human samples provided by 1 healthy donor. (A–C) P values were determined using 1-way ANOVA (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared with the indicated 2 columns; NS, #P < 0.05, and ##P < 0.01 compared with each black circle). Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts