Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
TGF-β inhibition via CRISPR promotes the long-term efficacy of CAR T cells against solid tumors
Na Tang, Chen Cheng, Xingying Zhang, Miaomiao Qiao, Na Li, Wei Mu, Xiao-Fei Wei, Weidong Han, Haoyi Wang
Na Tang, Chen Cheng, Xingying Zhang, Miaomiao Qiao, Na Li, Wei Mu, Xiao-Fei Wei, Weidong Han, Haoyi Wang
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology Therapeutics

TGF-β inhibition via CRISPR promotes the long-term efficacy of CAR T cells against solid tumors

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

In recent years, chimeric antigen receptor–modified T cell (CAR T cell) therapy has proven to be a promising approach against cancer. Nonetheless, this approach still faces multiple challenges in eliminating solid tumors, one of which being the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we demonstrated that knocking out the endogenous TGF-β receptor II (TGFBR2) in CAR T cells with CRISPR/Cas9 technology could reduce the induced Treg conversion and prevent the exhaustion of CAR T ce lls. Meanwhile, TGFBR2-edited CAR T cells had better in vivo tumor elimination efficacy, both in cell line–derived xenograft and patient-derived xenograft solid tumor models, whether administered locally or systemically. In addition, the TGFBR2-edited CAR T cells could eliminate contralaterally reinoculated xenografts in mice effectively, with an increased proportion of memory subsets within circulating CAR T cells of central memory and effector memory subsets. In conclusion, we greatly improved the in vitro and in vivo function of CAR T cells in TGF-β–rich tumor environments by knocking out endogenous TGFBR2 and propose a potentially new method to improve the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy for treating solid tumors.

Authors

Na Tang, Chen Cheng, Xingying Zhang, Miaomiao Qiao, Na Li, Wei Mu, Xiao-Fei Wei, Weidong Han, Haoyi Wang

×

Figure 5

TGFBR2 KO improved in vivo tumor elimination efficacy of CAR T cells in CDX models after local administration.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint

TGFBR2 KO improved in vivo tumor elimination efficacy of CAR T cells in...
(A) Mesothelin and TGF-β1 expression in the CDX model. Scale bar: 200 μm. (B) Schematic of the in vivo experimental design using CDX models. (C) Fold changes of tumor volume and (D) mouse body weight after intratumor (i.t.) administration of CAR T cells. (E) Inflammatory cell infiltration of CAR T cells into liver detected by H&E staining in the CDX model. Scale bar: 200 μm. (F) Peripheral blood analysis of the proportion of hCD3+ cells after CAR T cell i.t. administration. (G) Indel frequencies of M28z-TKO cells, before and after administration, determined by TIDE analysis. (H) Analysis of T cell subsets in peripheral blood after CAR T cell i.t. administration. M28z-TKO, TGFBR2-KO M28z; PB, peripheral blood; CM, central memory; EM, effector memory. Mean ± SD, n = 5. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used in C and D. Ordinary 1-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used in F. Two-way ANOVA and Sidak’s multiple comparisons test was used in H.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts