Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Focal adhesion proteins Pinch1 and Pinch2 regulate bone homeostasis in mice
Yishu Wang, Qinnan Yan, Yiran Zhao, Xin Liu, Simin Lin, Peijun Zhang, Liting Ma, Yumei Lai, Xiaochun Bai, Chuanju Liu, Chuanyue Wu, Jian Q. Feng, Di Chen, Huiling Cao, Guozhi Xiao
Yishu Wang, Qinnan Yan, Yiran Zhao, Xin Liu, Simin Lin, Peijun Zhang, Liting Ma, Yumei Lai, Xiaochun Bai, Chuanju Liu, Chuanyue Wu, Jian Q. Feng, Di Chen, Huiling Cao, Guozhi Xiao
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Bone biology

Focal adhesion proteins Pinch1 and Pinch2 regulate bone homeostasis in mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Mammalian focal adhesion proteins Pinch1 and Pinch2 regulate integrin activation and cell–extracellular matrix adhesion and migration. Here, we show that deleting Pinch1 in osteocytes and mature osteoblasts using the 10-kb mouse Dmp1-Cre and Pinch2 globally (double KO; dKO) results in severe osteopenia throughout life, while ablating either gene does not cause bone loss, suggesting a functional redundancy of both factors in bone. Pinch deletion in osteocytes and mature osteoblasts generates signals that inhibit osteoblast and bone formation. Pinch-deficient osteocytes and conditioned media from dKO bone slice cultures contain abundant sclerostin protein and potently suppress osteoblast differentiation in primary BM stromal cells (BMSC) and calvarial cultures. Pinch deletion increases adiposity in the BM cavity. Primary dKO BMSC cultures display decreased osteoblastic but enhanced adipogenic, differentiation capacity. Pinch loss decreases expression of integrin β3, integrin-linked kinase (ILK), and α-parvin and increases that of active caspase-3 and -8 in osteocytes. Pinch loss increases osteocyte apoptosis in vitro and in bone. Pinch loss upregulates expression of both Rankl and Opg in the cortical bone and does not increase osteoclast formation and bone resorption. Finally, Pinch ablation exacerbates hindlimb unloading–induced bone loss and impairs active ulna loading–stimulated bone formation. Thus, we establish a critical role of Pinch in control of bone homeostasis.

Authors

Yishu Wang, Qinnan Yan, Yiran Zhao, Xin Liu, Simin Lin, Peijun Zhang, Liting Ma, Yumei Lai, Xiaochun Bai, Chuanju Liu, Chuanyue Wu, Jian Q. Feng, Di Chen, Huiling Cao, Guozhi Xiao

×

Figure 8

Pinch deletion exacerbates hindlimb unloading-induced bone loss and reduces active ulna loading–stimulated bone formation.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Pinch deletion exacerbates hindlimb unloading-induced bone loss and redu...
(A–F) Hindlimb unloading (HLU) experiment. Three-month-old female control and dKO mice were treated with or without tail suspension for 21 days, followed by μCT analysis of femurs. (A) Three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction. Scale bar: 100 μm. (B–F) Quantitative analyses of BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Sp, Tb.Th, and Ct.Th. n = 10 mice per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.01, control (Con) vs. HLU; #P < 0.05, Con-HLU/Con vs. dKO-HLU/dKO, 2-way ANOVA. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. (G–J) Ulna loading experiment. Three-month-old female control and dKO mice were subjected to ulna loading as described in Methods. Quantitative analyses for Ct.Th (G). Sections of nondemineralized femurs of control and dKO mice with and without loading were used for measurements of mineralization apposition rate (MAR) and bone formation rate (BFR) (H–J). Quantitative MAR and BFR data for diaphyseal cortical bones. n = 9 mice per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.01, Con vs. load; #P < 0.05, Con-load/Con vs. dKO-load/dKO, 2-way ANOVA. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Scale bar: 20 μm.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts