Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Conditional deletion of smooth muscle Cullin-3 causes severe progressive hypertension
Larry N. Agbor, Anand R. Nair, Jing Wu, Ko-Ting Lu, Deborah R. Davis, Henry L. Keen, Frederick W. Quelle, James A. McCormick, Jeffrey D. Singer, Curt D. Sigmund
Larry N. Agbor, Anand R. Nair, Jing Wu, Ko-Ting Lu, Deborah R. Davis, Henry L. Keen, Frederick W. Quelle, James A. McCormick, Jeffrey D. Singer, Curt D. Sigmund
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Vascular biology

Conditional deletion of smooth muscle Cullin-3 causes severe progressive hypertension

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Patients with mutations in Cullin-3 (CUL3) exhibit severe early-onset hypertension, but the contribution of the smooth muscle remains unclear. Conditional genetic ablation of CUL3 in vascular smooth muscle (S-CUL3KO) causes progressive impairment in response to NO, rapid development of severe hypertension, and increased arterial stiffness. Loss of CUL3 in primary aortic smooth muscle cells or aorta resulted in decreased expression of the NO receptor soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC), a marked reduction in cGMP production, and impaired vasodilation to cGMP analogs. Vasodilation responses to a selective large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel activator were normal, suggesting that downstream signals that promote smooth muscle–dependent relaxation remained intact. We conclude that smooth muscle–specific CUL3 ablation impairs both cGMP production and cGMP responses and that loss of CUL3 function selectively in smooth muscle is sufficient to cause severe hypertension by interfering with the NO/sGC/cGMP pathway. Our study provides evidence that vascular smooth muscle CUL3 is a major regulator of BP. CUL3 mutations cause severe vascular dysfunction, arterial stiffness, and hypertension due to defects in vascular smooth muscle.

Authors

Larry N. Agbor, Anand R. Nair, Jing Wu, Ko-Ting Lu, Deborah R. Davis, Henry L. Keen, Frederick W. Quelle, James A. McCormick, Jeffrey D. Singer, Curt D. Sigmund

×

Figure 2

Vasodilation of aorta and basilar arteries.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Vasodilation of aorta and basilar arteries.
(A–D) Isometric tension was ...
(A–D) Isometric tension was determined on aortic rings 2 weeks after control or tamoxifen administration. Dose-dependent relaxation was measured (following precontraction with prostaglandin F2α [PGF2α] to 45%–50% of maximal PGF2α). Relaxation responses to acetylcholine (A, n = 8–12/genotype), sodium nitroprusside (SNP; B, n = 8–12/genotype), methacholine (C, n = 6/genotype), and DEA NONOate (D, n = 6/genotype) were assessed. (E and F) Basilar arteries were cannulated and pressurized to 60 mmHg and precontracted with the thromboxane A2 mimetic (U46619) to 30% internal diameter. Dose-dependent relaxation to acetylcholine (Ach; E, n = 6–8/genotype) or sodium nitroprusside (SNP; F, n = 6–8/genotype) was assessed. For A–F, error bars represent mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 by 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA vs. other groups shown in each panel.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts