Usage Information
Abstract
Human islet isolation is a cost- and resource-intensive program for generating islets for cell therapy in type 1 diabetes. However, only one-third of cadaveric pancreases get to clinical transplantation because of low quality/number of islets. There is a need to identify biomarkers that predict the quality of islets, before initiating their isolation. Here, we sequenced transcriptomes from 18 human islet preparations stratified into 3 groups (group 1: best quality/transplantable islets; group 2: intermediary quality; and group 3: inferior quality/nontransplantable islets) based on routine measurements, including islet purity/viability. Machine-learning algorithms involving penalized regression analyses identified 10 long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) that were significantly different across all group-wise comparisons (group 1 vs. group 2, group 2 vs. group 3, and group 1 vs. group 3). Two variants of metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) lncRNA were common across all comparisons. We then confirmed RNA-Seq findings in a validation set of 75 human islet preparations. Finally, in 19 pancreas samples, we demonstrated that assessing the levels of MALAT1 variants alone (receiver operator characteristic curve AUC: 0.83) offers higher specificity in predicting postisolation islet quality, further improving the predictive potential for clinical islet transplantation when combined with Edmonton Donor Points/BMI/North American Islet Donor Score. We present this resource of islet quality–stratified lncRNA transcriptome data and identify MALAT1 as a biomarker that significantly enhances current selection methods for clinical-grade (good manufacturing practice–grade) islet isolation.
Authors
Wilson K.M. Wong, Guozhi Jiang, Anja E. Sørensen, Yi Vee Chew, Cody Lee-Maynard, David Liuwantara, Lindy Williams, Philip J. O’Connell, Louise T. Dalgaard, Ronald C. Ma, Wayne J. Hawthorne, Mugdha V. Joglekar, Anandwardhan A. Hardikar
Usage data is cumulative from January 2025 through January 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,092 | 96 |
| 130 | 16 | |
| Figure | 118 | 0 |
| Table | 72 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 65 | 2 |
| Citation downloads | 102 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,579 | 114 |
| Total Views | 1,693 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
