Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
A muscle-specific UBE2O/AMPKα2 axis promotes insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome in obesity
Isabelle K. Vila, … , Su Jung Song, Min Sup Song
Isabelle K. Vila, … , Su Jung Song, Min Sup Song
Published July 11, 2019
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2019;4(13):e128269. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.128269.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Endocrinology Metabolism

A muscle-specific UBE2O/AMPKα2 axis promotes insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome in obesity

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2O (UBE2O) is expressed preferentially in metabolic tissues, but its role in regulating energy homeostasis has yet to be defined. Here we find that UBE2O is markedly upregulated in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes and show that whole-body disruption of Ube2o in mouse models in vivo results in improved metabolic profiles and resistance to high-fat diet–induced (HFD-induced) obesity and metabolic syndrome. With no difference in nutrient intake, Ube2o–/– mice were leaner and expended more energy than WT mice. In addition, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp studies revealed that Ube2o–/– mice were profoundly insulin sensitive. Through phenotype analysis of HFD mice with muscle-, fat-, or liver–specific knockout of Ube2o, we further identified UBE2O as an essential regulator of glucose and lipid metabolism programs in skeletal muscle, but not in adipose or liver tissue. Mechanistically, UBE2O acted as a ubiquitin ligase and targeted AMPKα2 for ubiquitin-dependent degradation in skeletal muscle; further, muscle-specific heterozygous knockout of Prkaa2 ablated UBE2O-controlled metabolic processes. These results identify the UBE2O/AMPKα2 axis as both a potent regulator of metabolic homeostasis in skeletal muscle and a therapeutic target in the treatment of diabetes and metabolic disorders.

Authors

Isabelle K. Vila, Mi Kyung Park, Stephanie Rebecca Setijono, Yixin Yao, Hyejin Kim, Pierre-Marie Badin, Sekyu Choi, Vihang Narkar, Sung-Woo Choi, Jongkyeong Chung, Cedric Moro, Su Jung Song, Min Sup Song

×

Figure 7

Activation of skeletal muscle AMPKα2 drives the protective effects of UBE2O loss on diabetes and metabolic disorders.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Activation of skeletal muscle AMPKα2 drives the protective effects of UB...
(A) Body weights of control (Ube2ofl/fl), Ube2oΔMus, and ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ mice fed an HFD for 20 weeks. Ube2ofl/fl n = 13, Ube2oΔMus n = 7, ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ n = 7. (B) Percentage of fat and lean mass of control, Ube2oΔMus, and ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ mice on an HFD for 16 weeks was determined by EchoMRI. Ube2ofl/fl n = 6, Ube2oΔMus n = 3, ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ n = 5. (C) H&E-stained sections of SAT in control, Ube2oΔMus, and ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ mice on an HFD for 20 weeks. Scale bars: 75 μm. (D) Plasma levels of TC (mg/dL) in control, Ube2oΔMus, and ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ mice on an HFD for 20 weeks. Ube2ofl/fl n = 5, Ube2oΔMus n = 3, ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ n = 5. (E) Photographs and H&E-stained sections of liver in control, Ube2oΔMus, and ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ mice on an HFD for 20 weeks. Scale bars: 75 μm. (F) Liver weight of control, Ube2oΔMus, and ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ mice on an HFD for 20 weeks. Ube2ofl/fl n = 6, Ube2oΔMus n = 3, ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ n = 6. (G) Hepatic TG level per g of liver of control, Ube2oΔMus and ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ mice on HFD for 20 weeks. Ube2ofl/fl n = 6, Ube2oΔMus n = 3, ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ n = 6. (H) Total RNAs from WAT and BAT of control, Ube2oΔMus, and ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ mice on an HFD for 20 weeks were subjected to RT-qPCR. n = 4. (I) Lysates from skeletal muscle of control, Ube2oΔMus, and ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ mice on an HFD for 20 weeks were subjected to immunoblotting for the indicated proteins. (J) Total RNAs from skeletal muscle of control, Ube2oΔMus, and ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ mice on an HFD for 20 weeks were subjected to RT-qPCR. n = 4. GTTs (K) and ITTs (L) in control, Ube2oΔMus, and ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ mice on an HFD for 9 and 10 weeks, respectively. AUC (K) and AAC (L) are shown in the right panels. Ube2ofl/fl n = 5, Ube2oΔMus n = 3, ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+ n = 5. Error bars represent ±SEM. P value was determined by ANOVA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, Ube2ofl/fl vs. Ube2oΔMus; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, Ube2oΔMus vs. ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+; †P < 0.05, Ube2ofl/fl vs. ΔMus;Prkaa2Δ/+.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts