Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Macrophage migration inhibitory factor enhances influenza-associated mortality in mice
Candice A. Smith, Daniel J. Tyrell, Upasana A. Kulkarni, Sherri Wood, Lin Leng, Rachel L. Zemans, Richard Bucala, Daniel R. Goldstein
Candice A. Smith, Daniel J. Tyrell, Upasana A. Kulkarni, Sherri Wood, Lin Leng, Rachel L. Zemans, Richard Bucala, Daniel R. Goldstein
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Infectious disease

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor enhances influenza-associated mortality in mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Influenza-associated mortality continues to occur annually despite available antiviral therapies. New therapies that improve host immunity could reduce influenza virus disease burden. Targeting macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) has improved the outcomes of certain inflammatory diseases, but its role in influenza viral infection is unclear. Here, we showed that, during influenza viral infection, Mif-deficient mice have less inflammation, viral load, and mortality compared with WT control mice; conversely, Tg mice, overexpressing Mif in alveolar epithelial cells, had higher inflammation, viral load, and mortality. Antibody-mediated blockade of MIF in WT mice during influenza viral infection improved their survival. Mif-deficient murine lungs showed reduced levels of parkin, a mitophagy protein that negatively regulates antiviral signaling, prior to infection and augmented antiviral type I/III IFN levels in the airspaces after infection as compared with WT lungs. Additionally, in vitro assays with human lung epithelial cells showed that treatment with recombinant human MIF increased the percentage of influenza virus–infected cells. In conclusion, our study reveals that MIF impairs antiviral host immunity and increases inflammation during influenza infection and suggests that targeting MIF could be therapeutically beneficial during influenza viral infection.

Authors

Candice A. Smith, Daniel J. Tyrell, Upasana A. Kulkarni, Sherri Wood, Lin Leng, Rachel L. Zemans, Richard Bucala, Daniel R. Goldstein

×

Figure 1

MIF increases in the airspace and enhances morbidity and mortality after infection with IAV.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
MIF increases in the airspace and enhances morbidity and mortality after...
MIF-knockout (Mif–/–, white circles), WT (Mif+/+, gray circles), and Mif-overexpressing Tg (Mif-lung-tg, pink circles) C57BL/6 background mice were challenged i.n. with 5 × 104 PFU H1N1 PR8. (A) MIF in the BAL measured by ELISA. The mice were monitored daily for (B) survival, (C) body weight, and (D) clinical score. (E) Survival curve of WT mice injected i.p. with anti-MIF antibody (black squares) or mouse IgG (black circles) on days labeled with blue arrows and infected with 5 × 104 PFU H1N1 PR8 at 0 DPI. Statistical differences were determined by (A) multiple t tests adjusted for multiple comparisons by Holm-Sidak test, (B and E) Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test, or (C and D) 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparisons test. The violin plots are closed curves representing data distribution and encapsulate the median, range, and interquartile range, with each symbol representing a biological replicate (A). The data are displayed as mean ± SEM (C and D). There was no significant difference in survival rate between WT control groups in survival studies for Mif–/– or Mif-lung-tg mice; a representative group is shown in B–D for clarity. Data are representative of 2 independent experiments, with n = 4–5/group (A), 15–18 mice/group at time of infection (B–D), or (E) 8–10 mice/group at time of first injection. For only C and D, significance is denoted between Mif+/+ and Mif-lung-tg with a red asterisk; whereas, significant differences between Mif–/– and Mif+/+ were denoted with a black asterisk. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts