Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2020;5(2):e127655. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.127655.
Abstract
A recent study of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) for active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) showed efficacy in preventing disease worsening. However, the immunologic basis for efficacy remains poorly defined. Multiple sclerosis pathology is known to be driven by inflammatory T cells that infiltrate the CNS. Therefore, we hypothesized that the preexisting T cell repertoire in the intrathecal compartment of active RRMS participants was ablated and replaced with new clones following AHSCT. T cell repertoires were assessed using high-throughput TCRβ chain sequencing in paired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and peripheral blood CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from participants that underwent AHSCT, before and up to 4 years following transplantation. More than 90% of the preexisting CSF repertoire in participants with active RRMS was removed following AHSCT and replaced with clonotypes predominantly generated from engrafted autologous stem cells. Of the preexisting clones in CSF, approximately 60% were also detected in blood before therapy, and concordant treatment effects were observed for clonotypes in both compartments following AHSCT. These results indicate that replacement of the preexisting TCR repertoire in active RRMS is a mechanism for AHSCT efficacy and suggest that peripheral blood could serve as a surrogate for CSF to define mechanisms associated with efficacy in future studies of AHSCT.
Authors
Kristina M. Harris, Noha Lim, Paul Lindau, Harlan Robins, Linda M. Griffith, Richard A. Nash, Laurence A. Turka, Paolo A. Muraro
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 306 | 54 |
| 66 | 28 | |
| Figure | 143 | 7 |
| Supplemental data | 22 | 1 |
| Citation downloads | 50 | 0 |
| Totals | 587 | 90 |
| Total Views | 677 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
