Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Two human patient mitochondrial pyruvate carrier mutations reveal distinct molecular mechanisms of dysfunction
Lalita Oonthonpan, Adam J. Rauckhorst, Lawrence R. Gray, Audrey C. Boutron, Eric B. Taylor
Lalita Oonthonpan, Adam J. Rauckhorst, Lawrence R. Gray, Audrey C. Boutron, Eric B. Taylor
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Metabolism

Two human patient mitochondrial pyruvate carrier mutations reveal distinct molecular mechanisms of dysfunction

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC) occupies a central metabolic node by transporting cytosolic pyruvate into the mitochondrial matrix and linking glycolysis with mitochondrial metabolism. Two reported human MPC1 mutations cause developmental abnormalities, neurological problems, metabolic deficits, and for one patient, early death. We aimed to understand biochemical mechanisms by which the human patient C289T and T236A MPC1 alleles disrupt MPC function. MPC1 C289T encodes 2 protein variants, a misspliced, truncation mutant (A58G) and a full-length point mutant (R97W). MPC1 T236A encodes a full-length point mutant (L79H). Using human patient fibroblasts and complementation of CRISPR-deleted, MPC1-null mouse C2C12 cells, we investigated how MPC1 mutations cause MPC deficiency. Truncated MPC1 A58G protein was intrinsically unstable and failed to form MPC complexes. The MPC1 R97W protein was less stable but, when overexpressed, formed complexes with MPC2 that retained pyruvate transport activity. Conversely, MPC1 L79H protein formed stable complexes with MPC2, but these complexes failed to transport pyruvate. These findings inform MPC structure-function relationships and delineate 3 distinct biochemical pathologies resulting from 2 human patient MPC1 mutations. They also illustrate an efficient gene pass-through system for mechanistically investigating human inborn errors in pyruvate metabolism.

Authors

Lalita Oonthonpan, Adam J. Rauckhorst, Lawrence R. Gray, Audrey C. Boutron, Eric B. Taylor

×

Figure 4

MPC1 patient mutations display varied MPC complex stability and activity.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
MPC1 patient mutations display varied MPC complex stability and activity...
(A) Representative MPC1, MPC2, and VDAC with Actin levels visualized by immunoblot in WT C2C12 cells transduced with guideless Cas9 vector and subsequently with an empty vector (WT+EV) compared with ΔMpc1 cells complemented with an empty vector (EV), WT human MPC1 (WT), or MPC1 mutants (L79H, R97W, and A58G) (n = 3). (B and C) Quantification of MPC1 (B) and MPC2 (C) protein levels relative to Actin, statistics versus ΔMpc1+WT (B) or WT+EV (C) (n = 3). (D) Respiration driven by 10 mM pyruvate of cell lines described in A. Letters represent a significant difference in FCCP-stimulated respiration among ΔMpc1+EV, ΔMpc1+L79H, ΔMpc1+A58G (a–c; P ≤ 0.001) and ΔMpc1+WT, ΔMpc1+R97W (d and e, P ≤ 0.05) versus WT+EV, and in UK5099-inhibited respiration among ΔMpc1+EV and ΔMpc1+L79H, ΔMpc1+A58G (f–h; P ≤ 0.01) versus WT+EV (n = 12; 2 clone lines/genotype × 6 technical replicates/clone line). (E) Quantification of FCCP-stimulated normalized to basal pyruvate-driven respiration by complemented ΔMpc1 cell lines as compared with WT+EV (n = 12; 2 clone lines/genotype × 6 technical replicates/clone line). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA was performed for B–E (#P ≤ 0.05, ##P ≤ 0.01, ###P ≤ 0.001; see also Supplemental Figures 4 and 5).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts