Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Survival during influenza-associated bacterial superinfection improves following viral- and bacterial-specific monoclonal antibody treatment
Keven M. Robinson, … , Taylor S. Cohen, John F. Alcorn
Keven M. Robinson, … , Taylor S. Cohen, John F. Alcorn
Published July 25, 2019
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2019;4(14):e125554. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.125554.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Infectious disease

Survival during influenza-associated bacterial superinfection improves following viral- and bacterial-specific monoclonal antibody treatment

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Postinfluenza bacterial superinfections cause increased morbidity and mortality compared with singular infection with influenza during both pandemics and seasonal epidemics. Vaccines and current treatments provide limited benefit, a rationale to conduct studies utilizing alternative therapies. FY1 and an optimized version, MEDI8852, anti-influenza HA mAbs, have been shown to neutralize influenza virus during singular influenza infection. MEDI4893*, an anti–Staphylococcus aureus α-toxin mAb, has been shown to improve survival when administered prophylactically prior to S. aureus pneumonia. Our objective was to determine if mAbs can improve survival during postinfluenza bacterial pneumonia. We administered FY1 in a murine model of postinfluenza methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) pneumonia and observed improved survival rates when given early during the course of influenza infection. Our findings indicate decreased lung injury and increased uptake and binding of bacteria by macrophages in the mice that received FY1 earlier in the course of influenza infection, corresponding to decreased bacterial burden. We also observed improved survival when mice were treated with a combination of FY1 and MEDI4893* late during the course of postinfluenza MRSA pneumonia. In conclusion, both FY1 and MEDI4893* prolong survival when used in a murine model of postinfluenza MRSA pneumonia, suggesting pathogen-specific mAbs as a possible therapeutic in the context of bacterial superinfection.

Authors

Keven M. Robinson, Krishnaveni Ramanan, Joshua M. Tobin, Kara L. Nickolich, Matthew J. Pilewski, Nicole L. Kallewaard, Bret R. Sellman, Taylor S. Cohen, John F. Alcorn

×

Figure 4

Influenza HA targeting mAb alters macrophage and neutrophil populations in the lung during influenza-associated bacterial pneumonia.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Influenza HA targeting mAb alters macrophage and neutrophil populations ...
C57BL/6 mice infected with 100 PFUs of influenza A PR/8/34 and received a single dose of FY1 on days 1, 3, or 5 after influenza infection. Mice received secondary infection with 5 × 107 CFUs of MRSA on day 6 after influenza and samples were harvested 24 hours following bacterial infection (n = 6). (A) CD11c+ cells in lung by flow cytometry. (B) CD11b+ cells in lung by flow cytometry. (C) CD11c+CD11b+ cells in lung by flow cytometry. (D) F480+ cells in lung by flow cytometry. (E) CD11c+F480+SiglecF+ cells in lung by flow cytometry. (F) CD11c–F480+SiglecF– cells in lung by flow cytometry. (G) CD11b+SiglecF+Ly6G– cells in lung by flow cytometry. (H) CD11b+Ly6G+ cells in lung by flow cytometry. (I) Percentage of Ly6GhiCD11b+ and Ly6GloCD11b+ cells in the lung by flow cytometry. *P < 0.05. Significance was tested by 1-way ANOVA using Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Data represent mean ± SEM.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts