Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Nononcogenic restoration of the intestinal barrier by E. coli–delivered human EGF
Mira Yu, Juil Kim, Jung Hoon Ahn, Yuseok Moon
Mira Yu, Juil Kim, Jung Hoon Ahn, Yuseok Moon
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Microbiology

Nononcogenic restoration of the intestinal barrier by E. coli–delivered human EGF

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Although mucoactive proteins, such as epidermal growth factor (EGF), could improve clinical outcomes of intestinal ulcerative diseases, their gastrointestinal application is limited because of their proteolytic digestion or concerns about tumor promotion. In the present study, ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter–linked secretion of human EGF from probiotic Escherichia coli (EGF-EcN) was created to promote beneficial actions of the EGF receptor, which is notably attenuated in patients with intestinal ulcerative injuries. Preventive and postinjury treatment with EGF-EcN alleviated intestinal ulcers and other readouts of disease severity in murine intestinal ulcer models. EGF-EcN administration promoted the restitutive recovery of damaged epithelial layers, particularly via upward expansion of highly proliferating progenitor cells from the lower crypts. Along with the epithelial barrier benefit, EGF-EcN improved goblet cell–associated mucosal integrity, which controls the access of luminal microbiota to the underlying host tissues. Despite concern about the oncogenic action of EGF, EGF-EcN did not aggravate colitis-associated colon cancer; instead, it alleviated protumorigenic activities and improved barrier integrity in the lesions. All findings indicate that probiotic bacteria–based precision delivery of human EGF is a promising mucosal intervention against gastrointestinal ulcers and malignant distress through crypt-derived barrier restoration.

Authors

Mira Yu, Juil Kim, Jung Hoon Ahn, Yuseok Moon

×

Figure 5

Links of EGFR expressions to gut barrier integrity.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Links of EGFR expressions to gut barrier integrity.
(A and B) The EGFR e...
(A and B) The EGFR expressions were correlated with genes associated with gut barrier integrity (CLDN3, TJP1, MUC2, LGR5, and SOX9) in intestines of patients with IBD (Sleiman’s, GEO ID GSE10616, n = 58; Vemeire’s, GEO ID GSE75214, n = 194; and Haberman’s GEO ID GSE57945, n = 194). Analysis of Vemeire’s samples was performed with colonic mRNA (B). All values were based on Pearson’s correlation analysis (R, Pearson’s correlation coefficient). (C–E) Six-week-old female mice were pretreated twice with vehicle, EcN, or EGF-EcN over 7 days (n = 12–15). The mice were then exposed to 3% DSS for 5 days to induce colitis. Claudin-3 (C), TJP1 (D), and cleaved caspase-3 (E) were detected and counterstained with hematoxylin (original magnification, ×200; inset magnification, ×800). Scale bar: 100 μm. A quantitative comparison is shown in each right graph. The asterisks represent significant differences between 2 groups (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns using 2-tailed, unpaired Student’s t test).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts