Usage Information
Abstract
Primary prostate cancer lesions are clonally heterogeneous and often arise independently. In contrast, metastases were reported to share a monoclonal background. Because prostate cancer mortality is the consequence of distant metastases, prevention of metastatic outgrowth by primary tumor ablation is the main focus of treatment for localized disease. Focal therapy is targeted ablation of the primary index lesion, but it is unclear whether remaining primary lesions metastasize at a later stage. In this study, we compared copy number aberration profiles of primary prostate cancer lesions with matching pelvic lymph node metastases of 30 patients to establish clonality between a lymph node metastasis and multiple primary lesions within the same patient. Interestingly, in 23.3% of the cases, the regional metastasis was not clonally linked to the index primary lesion. These findings suggest that focal ablation of only the index lesion is potentially an undertreatment of a significant proportion of prostate cancer patients.
Authors
Jeroen Kneppers, Oscar Krijgsman, Monique Melis, Jeroen de Jong, Daniel S. Peeper, Elise Bekers, Henk G. van der Poel, Wilbert Zwart, Andries M. Bergman
Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 331 | 41 |
| 94 | 12 | |
| Figure | 233 | 1 |
| Table | 50 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 88 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 140 | 0 |
| Totals | 936 | 54 |
| Total Views | 990 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
