Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Effect of mirtazapine on metabolism and energy substrate partitioning in healthy men
Johannes M. Hennings, Sarah Heel, Katharina Lechner, Manfred Uhr, Tatjana Dose, Ludwig Schaaf, Florian Holsboer, Susanne Lucae, Stephany Fulda, Stefan Kloiber
Johannes M. Hennings, Sarah Heel, Katharina Lechner, Manfred Uhr, Tatjana Dose, Ludwig Schaaf, Florian Holsboer, Susanne Lucae, Stephany Fulda, Stefan Kloiber
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health Metabolism Neuroscience

Effect of mirtazapine on metabolism and energy substrate partitioning in healthy men

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND. Weight gain and metabolic changes during treatment with antidepressant drugs have emerged as an important concern, particularly in long-term treatment. It is still a matter of ongoing debate whether weight gain and metabolic perturbations with antidepressant use are the consequence of increased appetite and weight gain, respectively, or represents direct pharmacological effects of the drug on metabolism. METHODS. We therefore conducted a proof-of-concept, open-label clinical trial, hypothesizing that in exceptionally healthy men no change of metabolic parameters would occur under mirtazapine, when environmental factors such as nutrition, sleep, and physical exercise were controlled and kept constant. Over a 3-week preparation phase, 10 healthy, young men were attuned to a standardized diet adjusted to their individual caloric need, to a regular sleep/wake cycle and moderate exercise. Continuing this protocol, we administered 30 mg mirtazapine daily for 7 days. RESULTS. While no significant weight gain or changes in resting energy expenditure were observed under these conditions, hunger and appetite for sweets increased with mirtazapine, accompanied by a shift in energy substrate partitioning towards carbohydrate substrate preference as assessed by indirect calorimetry. Furthermore, with mirtazapine, insulin and C-peptide release increased in response to a standardized meal. CONCLUSION. Our findings provide important insights into weight-independent metabolic changes associated with mirtazapine and allow a better understanding of the long-term metabolic effects observed in patients treated with antidepressant drugs. TRIAL REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00878540. FUNDING. Nothing to declare.

Authors

Johannes M. Hennings, Sarah Heel, Katharina Lechner, Manfred Uhr, Tatjana Dose, Ludwig Schaaf, Florian Holsboer, Susanne Lucae, Stephany Fulda, Stefan Kloiber

×

Figure 4

Oral glucose tolerance testing.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Oral glucose tolerance testing.
Mean plasma glucose (A), insulin (B), an...
Mean plasma glucose (A), insulin (B), and C-peptide (C) are depicted before (–15 and 0 minutes) and after (15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes) ingestion of a standardized test meal. P values refer to group comparison of areas under the concentration curve (AUC) before (black line) and after (gray line) mirtazapine treatment (AUC glucose: 15,366.9 mg/dl ± 2,390.4 SD vs. 16,515.6 mg/dl ± 1,726.7 SD; t = –1.593; P = 0.146; AUC insulin: 777.6 μU/ml ± 357.0 SD vs. 1,086.8 μU/ml ± 404.0 SD; t = –2.423; P = 0.038; AUC C-peptide: 168.8 nmol/l ± 36.7 vs. 196.9 nmol/l ± 34.6 SD; t = –2.769; P = 0.022 (paired t test; n = 10). Error bars are standard errors of the mean. A medium to high effect (change score; see ref. 18) was found for the change of the AUC for insulin and C-peptide (0.77 [0.65–0.89] and 0.88 [0.74–1.01], respectively). The effect sizes for the change of the glucose AUC was 0.5 (0.41–0.6). In a 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction, we found significant effects of mirtazapine for insulin and C-peptide (F[1, 9] = 6.69, P = 0.029 and F[1, 9] = 8.56, P = 0.017, respectively), but not for glucose (F[1, 9] = 2.27, P = 0.166). The time effect was significant in glucose, insulin, and C-peptide (F[7, 63] = 22.56, P = 1.14 × 10–8, P = 0.029, (F[7, 63] = 16.94, P = 2.95 × 10–5 and (F[7, 63] = 41.09, P = 1.86 × 10–8, respectively) while the mirtazapine × time interaction effects were not significant (F[7, 63] = 1.78, P = 0.188, (F[7, 63] = 2.41, P = 0.092 and (F[7, 63] = 2.01, P = 0.138, respectively). Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests of mirtazapine × time effects were not significant for any laboratory value.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts