Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Enterovirus D68 infection induces IL-17–dependent neutrophilic airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness
Charu Rajput, … , Emily T. Martin, Marc B. Hershenson
Charu Rajput, … , Emily T. Martin, Marc B. Hershenson
Published August 23, 2018
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2018;3(16):e121882. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.121882.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Infectious disease Pulmonology

Enterovirus D68 infection induces IL-17–dependent neutrophilic airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) shares biologic features with rhinovirus (RV). In 2014, a nationwide outbreak of EV-D68 was associated with severe asthma-like symptoms. We sought to develop a mouse model of EV-D68 infection and determine the mechanisms underlying airway disease. BALB/c mice were inoculated intranasally with EV-D68 (2014 isolate), RV-A1B, or sham, alone or in combination with anti–IL-17A or house dust mite (HDM) treatment. Like RV-A1B, lung EV-D68 viral RNA peaked 12 hours after infection. EV-D68 induced airway inflammation, expression of cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-12b, IL-17A, CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL10, and CCL2), and airway hyperresponsiveness, which were suppressed by anti–IL-17A antibody. Neutrophilic inflammation and airway responsiveness were significantly higher after EV-D68 compared with RV-A1B infection. Flow cytometry showed increased lineage–, NKp46–, RORγt+ IL-17+ILC3s and γδ T cells in the lungs of EV-D68–treated mice compared with those in RV-treated mice. EV-D68 infection of HDM-exposed mice induced additive or synergistic increases in BAL neutrophils and eosinophils and expression of IL-17, CCL11, IL-5, and Muc5AC. Finally, patients from the 2014 epidemic period with EV-D68 showed significantly higher nasopharyngeal IL-17 mRNA levels compared with patients with RV-A infection. EV-D68 infection induces IL-17–dependent airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness, which is greater than that generated by RV-A1B, consistent with the clinical picture of severe asthma-like symptoms.

Authors

Charu Rajput, Mingyuan Han, J. Kelley Bentley, Jing Lei, Tomoko Ishikawa, Qian Wu, Joanna L. Hinde, Amy P. Callear, Terri L. Stillwell, William T. Jackson, Emily T. Martin, Marc B. Hershenson

×

Figure 5

Treatment with anti–IL-17 antibody reduces EV-D68–induced airway responsiveness.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Treatment with anti–IL-17 antibody reduces EV-D68–induced airway respons...
Female 8- to 10-week-old BALB/c mice were treated with sham, 5 × 106 ePFU of EV-D68, or 5 × 106 PFU of RV-A1B alone or in combination with anti–IL-17 antibody or isotype control. Changes in airway resistance to nebulized increasing doses of methacholine were assessed in tracheotomized mice using a Buxco FinePointe plethysmograph. BAL and mRNA analysis was also carried out in similarly treated mice. (A) BAL cell counts for the indicated groups. (B) qPCR analysis of lung mRNA expression. Data are shown as mean ± SEM for 4 mice in each group from a single experiment. *P < 0.05 by ANOVA, compared with RV-1B; †P < 0.05 by ANOVA, compared with IgG. (C) Airway responsiveness to increasing doses of methacholine. n =3–4/group from a single experiment. *P < 0.05 by 2-way ANOVA, compared with sham; †P < 0.05 by 2-way ANOVA, compared with EV-D68 + IgG.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts