Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Marked disparity of microRNA modulation by cGMP-selective PDE5 versus PDE9 inhibitors in heart disease
Kristen M. Kokkonen-Simon, … , Dong Ik Lee, David A. Kass
Kristen M. Kokkonen-Simon, … , Dong Ik Lee, David A. Kass
Published August 9, 2018
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2018;3(15):e121739. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.121739.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cardiology Cell biology

Marked disparity of microRNA modulation by cGMP-selective PDE5 versus PDE9 inhibitors in heart disease

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRs) posttranscriptionally regulate mRNA and its translation into protein, and are considered master controllers of genes modulating normal physiology and disease. There is growing interest in how miRs change with drug treatment, and leveraging this for precision guided therapy. Here we contrast 2 closely related therapies, inhibitors of phosphodiesterase type 5 or type 9 (PDE5-I, PDE9-I), given to mice subjected to sustained cardiac pressure overload (PO). Both inhibitors augment cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) to activate protein kinase G, with PDE5-I regulating nitric oxide (NO) and PDE9-I natriuretic peptide–dependent signaling. While both produced strong phenotypic improvement of PO pathobiology, they surprisingly showed binary differences in miR profiles; PDE5-I broadly reduces more than 120 miRs, including nearly half those increased by PO, whereas PDE9-I has minimal impact on any miR (P < 0.0001). The disparity evolves after pre-miR processing and is organ specific. Lastly, even enhancing NO-coupled cGMP by different methods leads to altered miR regulation. Thus, seemingly similar therapeutic interventions can be barcoded by profound differences in miR signatures, and reversing disease-associated miR changes is not required for therapy success.

Authors

Kristen M. Kokkonen-Simon, Amir Saberi, Taishi Nakamura, Mark J. Ranek, Guangshuo Zhu, Djahida Bedja, Michaela Kuhn, Marc K. Halushka, Dong Ik Lee, David A. Kass

×

Figure 5

PDE5 inhibition in the normal heart and stressed lung.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
PDE5 inhibition in the normal heart and stressed lung.
(A) qRT-PCR was p...
(A) qRT-PCR was performed for various miRs in tissue from normal, nonstressed C57BL/6J mice treated with PDE5-I (Sil) for 5 weeks (n = 5 per group). Cardiac miRs that normally decrease with PO (top row) and increase with PO (bottom row) assessed from left ventricular tissue. Only miRs that were significantly decreased by Sil in Figure 4 were assayed. The dashed line in each graph represents the level to which Sil reduced miR expression in the PO model. (B) Lung tissue from C57BL/6J mice subjected to PO, PO+PDE5-I (Sil), or sham surgeries was analyzed by qRT-PCR for lung miRs (n = 5–6 per group). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 as compared with control for sham Sil heart analysis. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. For A, data were analyzed using 2-tailed unpaired t tests. For B, data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test, or Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts