Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Superior immune reconstitution using Treg-expanded donor cells versus PTCy treatment in preclinical HSCT models
Dietlinde Wolf, … , Krishna V. Komanduri, Robert B. Levy
Dietlinde Wolf, … , Krishna V. Komanduri, Robert B. Levy
Published October 18, 2018
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2018;3(20):e121717. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.121717.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Transplantation

Superior immune reconstitution using Treg-expanded donor cells versus PTCy treatment in preclinical HSCT models

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has been found to be effective in ameliorating acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). Adoptive transfer of high numbers of donor Tregs in experimental aHSCT has shown promise as a therapeutic modality for GVHD regulation. We recently described a strategy for in vivo Treg expansion targeting two receptors: TNFRSF25 and CD25. To date, there have been no direct comparisons between the use of PTCy and Tregs regarding outcome and immune reconstitution within identical groups of transplanted mice. Here, we assessed these two strategies and found both decreased clinical GVHD and improved survival long term. However, recipients transplanted with Treg-expanded donor cells (TrED) exhibited less weight loss early after HSCT. Additionally, TrED recipients demonstrated less thymic damage, significantly more recent thymic emigrants, and more rapid lymphoid engraftment. Three months after HSCT, PTCy-treated and TrED recipients showed tolerance to F1 skin allografts and comparable immune function. Overall, TrED was found superior to PTCy with regard to weight loss early after transplant and initial lymphoid engraftment. Based on these findings, we speculate that morbidity and mortality after transplant could be diminished following TrED transplant into aHSCT recipients, and, therefore, that TrED could provide a promising clinical strategy for GVHD prophylaxis.

Authors

Dietlinde Wolf, Cameron S. Bader, Henry Barreras, Sabrina Copsel, Brent J. Pfeiffer, Casey O. Lightbourn, Norman H. Altman, Krishna V. Komanduri, Robert B. Levy

×

Figure 7

Significantly higher frequencies of recent thymic/marrow emigrants in TrED recipients versus PTCy-treated animals and GVHD controls early after HSCT.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Significantly higher frequencies of recent thymic/marrow emigrants in Tr...
A HSCT utilizing a B6 BALB/c donor/recipient mouse model involving a complete MHC mismatch was performed on day 0. Lethally irradiated (8.5-Gy) BALB/c mice received 5 × 106 TCD B6-RAG2p-GFP BM cells and spleen cells from expanded (TL1A-Ig/IL-2; TrED group) or untreated B6-FoxP3rfp (GVHD and PTCy group) donor mice adjusted to contain 1.1 × 106 total T cells. Cyclophosphamide was given on day 3 and 4 after HSCT at 80 mg/kg i.p. Recent thymic/marrow emigrants (RTEs/RMEs) were analyzed in PB by flow cytometry 3 weeks after HSCT (BM, n = 2; GVHD, n = 5; PTCy and TrED, n = 8). (A) Significantly higher frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ RTEs as well as CD19+ B cells (RMEs) are detected in TrED recipients compared with PTCy-treated animals and GVHD controls. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM and were analyzed by a 2-tailed unpaired t test. (B) A representative histogram from the TrED and the PTCy group is shown. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts