Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Superior immune reconstitution using Treg-expanded donor cells versus PTCy treatment in preclinical HSCT models
Dietlinde Wolf, … , Krishna V. Komanduri, Robert B. Levy
Dietlinde Wolf, … , Krishna V. Komanduri, Robert B. Levy
Published October 18, 2018
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2018;3(20):e121717. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.121717.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Transplantation

Superior immune reconstitution using Treg-expanded donor cells versus PTCy treatment in preclinical HSCT models

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has been found to be effective in ameliorating acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). Adoptive transfer of high numbers of donor Tregs in experimental aHSCT has shown promise as a therapeutic modality for GVHD regulation. We recently described a strategy for in vivo Treg expansion targeting two receptors: TNFRSF25 and CD25. To date, there have been no direct comparisons between the use of PTCy and Tregs regarding outcome and immune reconstitution within identical groups of transplanted mice. Here, we assessed these two strategies and found both decreased clinical GVHD and improved survival long term. However, recipients transplanted with Treg-expanded donor cells (TrED) exhibited less weight loss early after HSCT. Additionally, TrED recipients demonstrated less thymic damage, significantly more recent thymic emigrants, and more rapid lymphoid engraftment. Three months after HSCT, PTCy-treated and TrED recipients showed tolerance to F1 skin allografts and comparable immune function. Overall, TrED was found superior to PTCy with regard to weight loss early after transplant and initial lymphoid engraftment. Based on these findings, we speculate that morbidity and mortality after transplant could be diminished following TrED transplant into aHSCT recipients, and, therefore, that TrED could provide a promising clinical strategy for GVHD prophylaxis.

Authors

Dietlinde Wolf, Cameron S. Bader, Henry Barreras, Sabrina Copsel, Brent J. Pfeiffer, Casey O. Lightbourn, Norman H. Altman, Krishna V. Komanduri, Robert B. Levy

×

Figure 4

aHSCT recipients of both TrED and PTCy are able to mount T cell recall responses following priming against alloantigens.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
aHSCT recipients of both TrED and PTCy are able to mount T cell recall r...
Three months after HSCT, recipients were immunized twice, 14 days apart, with 50 × 106 spleen, LN, and thymic cells from third-party complete MHC-disparate C3H/HeJ mice (H2k). Four days after the last immunization, splenocytes from both third-party C3H/HeJ (H2k) and F1 cells (BALB/c × C57/Bl6; H2b/d) were labeled with high (5 μM) and low (0.5 μM) levels of CFSE, respectively, and inoculated at a ratio of 1:1 (20 × 106 total) into groups of (a) unimmunized BM-transplanted BALB/c (“control”) mice and the immunized mice from both (b) TrED- and (c) PTCy-treated recipients. 12–18 hours later, all mice were sacrificed and cytotoxicity was assessed in the spleen by gating on the CFSE+ cells (n = 5). Cytotoxicity was calculated using the following formula: 1 – (C3Hsample × F1control)/(C3Hcontrol × F1sample) × 100. (A) TrED and PTCy recipients show comparable anti-C3H/HeJ H2k third-party cytotoxicity. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM and were analyzed by a 2-tailed unpaired t test. Data are pooled from 2 independent experiments. (B) Representative flow cytometry histograms. Lower fluorescent peaks of CFSE-labeled C3H versus F1 cells indicate cytotoxicity against these third-party target cells.

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts