Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Complement serves as a switch between CD4+ T cell–independent and –dependent RBC antibody responses
Amanda Mener, Seema R. Patel, Connie M. Arthur, Satheesh Chonat, Andreas Wieland, Manjula Santhanakrishnan, Jingchun Liu, Cheryl L. Maier, Ryan P. Jajosky, Kathryn Girard-Pierce, Ashley Bennett, Patricia E. Zerra, Nicole H. Smith, Jeanne E. Hendrickson, Sean R. Stowell
Amanda Mener, Seema R. Patel, Connie M. Arthur, Satheesh Chonat, Andreas Wieland, Manjula Santhanakrishnan, Jingchun Liu, Cheryl L. Maier, Ryan P. Jajosky, Kathryn Girard-Pierce, Ashley Bennett, Patricia E. Zerra, Nicole H. Smith, Jeanne E. Hendrickson, Sean R. Stowell
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Hematology

Complement serves as a switch between CD4+ T cell–independent and –dependent RBC antibody responses

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

RBC alloimmunization represents a significant immunological challenge for patients requiring lifelong transfusion support. The majority of clinically relevant non-ABO(H) blood group antigens have been thought to drive antibody formation through T cell–dependent immune pathways. Thus, we initially sought to define the role of CD4+ T cells in formation of alloantibodies to KEL, one of the leading causes of hemolytic transfusion reactions. Unexpectedly, our findings demonstrated that KEL RBCs actually possess the ability to induce antibody formation independent of CD4+ T cells or complement component 3 (C3), two common regulators of antibody formation. However, despite the ability of KEL RBCs to induce anti-KEL antibodies in the absence of complement, removal of C3 or complement receptors 1 and 2 (CR1/2) rendered recipients completely reliant on CD4+ T cells for IgG anti-KEL antibody formation. Together, these findings suggest that C3 may serve as a novel molecular switch that regulates the type of immunological pathway engaged following RBC transfusion.

Authors

Amanda Mener, Seema R. Patel, Connie M. Arthur, Satheesh Chonat, Andreas Wieland, Manjula Santhanakrishnan, Jingchun Liu, Cheryl L. Maier, Ryan P. Jajosky, Kathryn Girard-Pierce, Ashley Bennett, Patricia E. Zerra, Nicole H. Smith, Jeanne E. Hendrickson, Sean R. Stowell

×

Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through July 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 1,882 84
PDF 579 22
Figure 994 2
Table 176 0
Supplemental data 128 1
Citation downloads 282 0
Totals 4,041 109
Total Views 4,150
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts