Submit a comment
Abstract
Because older donor age is a major concern when considering kidneys for potential transplantation, we explored the actual impact of donor age on the features of kidneys that have been transplanted. We studied the correlations of donor age with molecular injury and rejection scores in 4502 kidney transplant biopsies assessed by microarrays, as well as function and postbiopsy survival. We used multivariable analyses to correct for the correlations of donor age with other predictive variables: recipient age, time of biopsy posttransplant, and deceased vs. living donors. Older donor age correlated with lower GFR and increased acute and chronic injury transcripts, but had no effect on rejection, which anti-correlated with recipient age. Acute injury transcripts peaked immediately posttransplant and regressed. Older donor age had little effect on acute molecular injury immediately posttransplant but strongly increased molecular injury scores at later times, peaking about 1-year posttransplant, indicating that older age does not increase molecular injury but increases failed repair post-injury. As expected, older donor age correlated with increased chronic injury and lower GFR, evident from the earliest time posttransplant, pre-transplant aging. However, despite significant age-related effects, the quantitative contribution of donor aging to molecular injury, function, and survival was very small.
Authors
Katelynn Madill-Thomsen, Martina Mackova, Jessica Chang, Enver Akalin, Tarek Alhamad, Sanjiv Anand, Miha Arnol, Rajendra Baliga, Mirosław Banasik, Christopher Blosser, Georg Böhmig, Daniel Brennan, Jonathan Bromberg, Klemens Budde, Andrzej Chamienia, Kevin V Chow, Michał Ciszek, Declan de Freitas, Dominika Dęborska-Materkowska, Alicja Dębska-Ślizień, Arjang Djamali, Leszek Domański, Magdalena Durlik, Gunilla Einecke, Farsad Eskandary, Richard Fatica, Iman Bajjoka-Francis, Justyna Fryc, John Gill, Jagbir Gill, Maciej Glyda, Sita Gourishankar, Marta Gryczman, Gaurav Gupta, Petra Hruba, Peter Hughes, Arskarapuk Jittirat, Zeljka Jurekovic, Layla Kamal, Mahmoud Kamel, Sam Kant, Nika Kojc, Joanna Konopa, James Lan, Roslyn Mannon, Arthur Matas, Joanna Mazurkiewicz, Marius Miglinas, Thomas Mueller, Marek Myślak, Beata Naumnik, Anita Patel, Agnieszka Perkowska-Ptasińska, Michael Picton, Grzegorz Piecha, Emillio Poggio, Silvie Rajnochova Bloudickova, Thomas Schachtner, Sung Shin, Soroush Shojai, Majid Sikosana, Janka Slatinská, Katarzyna Smykal-Jankowiak, Ashish Solanki, Zeljka Veceric Haler, Ondrej Viklicky, Ksenija Vucur Simic, Matthew R. Weir, Andrzej Wiecek, Zbigniew Włodarczyk, Ziad Zaky, Philip F. Halloran
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
