Submit a comment
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially life-saving therapy but can lead to lung injury due to chemoradiation toxicity, infection, and immune dysregulation We previously showed that bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) transcriptomes representing pulmonary inflammation and cellular injury can phenotype post-HCT lung injury and predict mortality. To test whether peripheral blood might be a suitable surrogate for BAL, we compared 210 paired BAL and blood transcriptomes obtained from 166 pediatric patients with HCT at 27 hospitals. BAL and blood RNA abundance showed minimal correlation at the level of individual genes, gene set enrichment scores, imputed cell fractions, and T and B cell receptor clonotypes. Instead, we identified significant site-specific transcriptional programs. In BAL, pathways related to immunity, hypoxia, and epithelial mesenchymal transition were tightly coexpressed and linked to mortality. In contrast, in blood, expression of endothelial injury, DNA repair, and cellular metabolism pathways was associated with mortality. Integration of paired BAL and blood transcriptomes dichotomized patients into 2 groups with significantly different rates of hypoxia and clinical outcomes within 1 week of BAL. These findings reveal a compartmentalized injury response, where BAL and blood transcriptomes provide distinct but complementary insights into local and systemic mechanisms of post-HCT lung injury.
Authors
Emma M. Pearce, Erica Evans, Madeline Y. Mayday, Gustavo Reyes, Miriam R. Simon, Jacob Blum, Hanna Kim, Jessica Mu, Peter J. Shaw, Courtney M. Rowan, Jeffery J. Auletta, Paul L. Martin, Caitlin Hurley, Erin M. Kreml, Muna Qayed, Hisham Abdel-Azim, Amy K. Keating, Geoffrey D.E. Cuvelier, Janet R. Hume, James S. Killinger, Kamar Godder, Rabi Hanna, Christine N. Duncan, Troy C. Quigg, Paul Castillo, Nahal R. Lalefar, Julie C. Fitzgerald, Kris M. Mahadeo, Prakash Satwani, Theodore B. Moore, Benjamin Hanisch, Aly Abdel-Mageed, Dereck B. Davis, Michelle P. Hudspeth, Greg A. Yanik, Michael A. Pulsipher, Christopher C. Dvorak, Joseph L. DeRisi, Matt S. Zinter
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
