Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Submit a comment

Prognostic importance of direct assignment of parent of origin via long-read genome and epigenome sequencing in retinoblastoma
Andrew W. Stacey, Kenji Nakamichi, Jennifer Huey, Jeffrey Stevens, Natalie Waligorski, Erin E. Crotty, Russell N. Van Gelder, Debarshi Mustafi
Andrew W. Stacey, Kenji Nakamichi, Jennifer Huey, Jeffrey Stevens, Natalie Waligorski, Erin E. Crotty, Russell N. Van Gelder, Debarshi Mustafi
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health Genetics Ophthalmology

Prognostic importance of direct assignment of parent of origin via long-read genome and epigenome sequencing in retinoblastoma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND Current clinical sequencing methods cannot effectively detect DNA methylation and allele-specific variation to provide parent-of-origin information from the proband alone. Parent-of-origin effects can lead to differential disease, and the inability to assign parent of origin in de novo cases limits prognostication in the majority of affected individuals with retinoblastoma, a hereditary cancer with suspected parent-of-origin effects.METHODS To directly assign parent of origin in patients with retinoblastoma, we extracted genomic DNA from blood samples for sequencing using a programmable, targeted, single-molecule, long-read DNA genomic and epigenomic approach. This allowed germline variant calling and simultaneous haplotype-resolved CpG methylation in participants with familial (n = 7) and de novo (n = 9) retinoblastoma.RESULTS Targeted long-read sequencing allowed phasing genomic variation with a differentially methylated region in intron 2 of the retinoblastoma gene to confirm parent of origin in known familial samples. This approach allowed us to directly assign parent of origin in simple and complex de novo cases from the proband alone. The ability to assign parent of origin in all retinoblastoma cases showed that harboring disease-causing variants on the paternally inherited allele, whether arising familially or de novo, was associated with more advanced cancer staging at presentation and significantly greater risk of chemotherapy failure (P = 0.002).CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the diagnostic potential of multiomic long-read profiling to unveil the parent-of-origin effect in hereditary cancer. The approach in this work will be instrumental in assigning parent of origin to other genetic diseases using local and distant imprinting signals in the genome.FUNDING National Eye Institute, NIH; Gerber Foundation; Research to Prevent Blindness; Angie Karalis Johnson Fund; Dawn’s Light Foundation; and Mark J. Daily, MD Research Fund

Authors

Andrew W. Stacey, Kenji Nakamichi, Jennifer Huey, Jeffrey Stevens, Natalie Waligorski, Erin E. Crotty, Russell N. Van Gelder, Debarshi Mustafi

×

Guidelines

The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.

  • Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
  • Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
  • The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
  • No appeals will be considered.
  • Comments are not indexed in PubMed.

Specific requirements

  • Maximum length, 400 words
  • Entered as plain text or HTML
  • Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
  • Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
  • Comments may not include figures
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts