Submit a comment
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2025;10(3):e186096. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.186096.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) around conception in preclinical models results in placental insufficiency, likely contributing to offspring abnormalities. Altered placental DNA methylation (DNAm) and gene expression suggest epigenetic mechanisms, perhaps involving impacts on methyl donor levels. PAE around conception in women is common but placental effects are rarely examined. This cohort study investigated associations between PAE around conception and intake/plasma measures of the methyl donors folate and choline, feto-placental blood flow, and placental growth measures, gene expression, and DNAm.METHODS Pregnant participants delivered at Mater Mothers’ Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (n = 411). Dietary intake of choline and folate were calculated and plasma concentrations measured using mass spectrometry (MS) and clinical immunoanalyzer, respectively. Cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) was calculated using Doppler measurements. Placentas were weighed/measured at delivery and samples used to quantify methyl donors (MS), global DNAm (ELISA), and gene expression (quantitative PCR). Data were compared between control/abstinent and PAE groups, by fetal sex.RESULTS A CPR <5th-centile, indicating fetal brain sparing because of placental insufficiency, was found in 2% of controls and 18% of the PAE group, mostly male fetuses (63%). Compared with controls, male PAE placentas had reduced mean thickness and placental growth factor mRNA and DNAm, whereas female PAE placentas had increased S-adenosylmethionine and a trend toward increased DNAm.CONCLUSION PAE around conception is associated with reduced CPR and altered placental growth measures, particularly in males, with potential implications for future health.FUNDING National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1191217) and Mary McConnel Career Boost Program for Women in Paediatric Research (WIS132020).
Authors
Sarah E. Steane, Christopher Edwards, Erika Cavanagh, Chelsea Vanderpeet, Jade M. Kubler, Lisa K. Akison, James S.M. Cuffe, Linda A. Gallo, Karen M. Moritz, Vicki L. Clifton
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
