Submit a comment
Abstract
BACKGROUND The high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV-HD) showed superior efficacy against laboratory-confirmed illness compared with the standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV-SD) in randomized controlled trials with the elderly. However, specific underlying mechanism remains unclear.METHODS This phase IV randomized controlled trial compared early innate responses induced by QIV-HD and QIV-SD in 59 individuals aged > 65 years. Systemic innate cells and gene signatures at day 0 (D0) and D1 as well as hemagglutinin inhibition antibody (HIA) titers at D0 and D21 after vaccination were assessed.RESULTS QIV-HD elicited robust humoral response with significantly higher antibody titers and seroconversion rates than QIV-SD. At D1 after vaccination, QIV-HD recipients showed significant reduction in innate cells, including conventional DCs and NK cells, compared with QIV-SD, correlating with significantly increased HIA titers at D21. Blood transcriptomic analysis revealed greater amplitude of gene expression in the QIV-HD arm, encompassing genes related to innate immune response, IFNs, and antigen processing and presentation, and correlated with humoral responses. Interestingly, comparative analysis with a literature dataset from young adults vaccinated with influenza standard-dose vaccine highlighted strong similarities in gene expression patterns and biological pathways with the elderly vaccinated with QIV-HD.CONCLUSION QIV-HD induces higher HIA titers than QIV-SD, a youthful boost of the innate gene expression significantly associated with high HIA titers.TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT no. 2021-004573-32.
Authors
Olivia Bonduelle, Tristan Delory, Isabelle Franco-Moscardini, Marion Ghidi, Selma Bennacer, Michele Wokam, Mathieu Lenormand, Melissa Petrier, Olivier Rogeaux, Simon de Bernard, Karine Alves, Julien Nourikyan, Bruno Lina, INFLUOMICS Study group, Behazine Combadiere, Cécile Janssen
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
