Submit a comment
Abstract
Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF), defined as the worsening of various interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), currently lacks useful biomarkers. To identify novel biomarkers for early detection of patients at risk of PPF, we performed a proteomic analysis of serum extracellular vesicles (EVs). Notably, the identified candidate biomarkers were enriched for lung-derived proteins participating in fibrosis-related pathways. Among them, pulmonary surfactant-associated protein B (SFTPB) in serum EVs could predict ILD progression better than the known biomarkers, serum KL-6 and SP-D, and it was identified as an independent prognostic factor from ILD-gender-age-physiology index. Subsequently, the utility of SFTPB for predicting ILD progression was evaluated further in 2 cohorts using serum EVs and serum, respectively, suggesting that SFTPB in serum EVs but not in serum was helpful. Among SFTPB forms, pro-SFTPB levels were increased in both serum EVs and lungs of patients with PPF compared with those of the control. Consistently, in a mouse model, the levels of pro-SFTPB, primarily originating from alveolar epithelial type 2 cells, were increased similarly in serum EVs and lungs, reflecting pro-fibrotic changes in the lungs, as supported by single-cell RNA sequencing. SFTPB, especially its pro-form, in serum EVs could serve as a biomarker for predicting ILD progression.
Authors
Takatoshi Enomoto, Yuya Shirai, Yoshito Takeda, Ryuya Edahiro, Shigeyuki Shichino, Mana Nakayama, Miho Takahashi-Itoh, Yoshimi Noda, Yuichi Adachi, Takahiro Kawasaki, Taro Koba, Yu Futami, Moto Yaga, Yuki Hosono, Hanako Yoshimura, Saori Amiya, Reina Hara, Makoto Yamamoto, Daisuke Nakatsubo, Yasuhiko Suga, Maiko Naito, Kentaro Masuhiro, Haruhiko Hirata, Kota Iwahori, Izumi Nagatomo, Kotaro Miyake, Shohei Koyama, Kiyoharu Fukushima, Takayuki Shiroyama, Yujiro Naito, Shinji Futami, Yayoi Natsume-Kitatani, Satoshi Nojima, Masahiro Yanagawa, Yasushi Shintani, Mari Nogami-Itoh, Kenji Mizuguchi, Jun Adachi, Takeshi Tomonaga, Yoshikazu Inoue, Atsushi Kumanogoh
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
