Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
T cells presenting viral antigens or autoantigens induce cytotoxic T cell anergy
Nathalie E. Blachère, Dana E. Orange, Emily C. Gantman, Bianca D. Santomasso, Graeme C. Couture, Teresa Ramirez-Montagut, John Fak, Kevin J. O’Donovan, Zhong Ru, Salina Parveen, Mayu O. Frank, Michael J. Moore, Robert B. Darnell
Nathalie E. Blachère, Dana E. Orange, Emily C. Gantman, Bianca D. Santomasso, Graeme C. Couture, Teresa Ramirez-Montagut, John Fak, Kevin J. O’Donovan, Zhong Ru, Salina Parveen, Mayu O. Frank, Michael J. Moore, Robert B. Darnell
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

T cells presenting viral antigens or autoantigens induce cytotoxic T cell anergy

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

In the course of modeling the naturally occurring tumor immunity seen in patients with paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD), we discovered an unexpectedly high threshold for breaking CD8+ cytotoxic T cell (CTL) tolerance to the PCD autoantigen, CDR2. While CDR2 expression was previously found to be strictly restricted to immune-privileged cells (cerebellum, testes, and tumors), unexpectedly we have found that T cells also express CDR2. This expression underlies inhibition of CTL activation; CTLs that respond to epithelial cells expressing CDR2 fail to respond to T cells expressing CDR2. This was a general phenomenon, as T cells presenting influenza (flu) antigen also fail to activate otherwise potent flu-specific CTLs either in vitro or in vivo. Moreover, transfer of flu peptide–pulsed T cells into flu-infected mice inhibits endogenous flu-specific CTLs. Our finding that T cells serve as a site of immune privilege, inhibiting effector CTL function, uncovers an autorepressive loop with general biologic and clinical relevance.

Authors

Nathalie E. Blachère, Dana E. Orange, Emily C. Gantman, Bianca D. Santomasso, Graeme C. Couture, Teresa Ramirez-Montagut, John Fak, Kevin J. O’Donovan, Zhong Ru, Salina Parveen, Mayu O. Frank, Michael J. Moore, Robert B. Darnell

×

Figure 6

T cell antigen presentation induces effector CTL split anergy.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
T cell antigen presentation induces effector CTL split anergy.
(A) Flow ...
(A) Flow cytometry of circulating CD45.2+ NP-specific tetramer+ CD8+ T cells in a flu-infected host transferred with either NP-pulsed (n = 10) or OVA-pulsed (n = 10) CD45.1+ CD8+ T cells. Each bar represents the mean and error bars are standard deviations. These data are representative of 2 experiments. (B) IFN-γ ELISPOT assay of NP-specific effector CTLs cultured with DCs or kidney epithelial cells (KECs) (stimulator to effector ratio of 1:30), or CD8+ or CD4+ T cells (stimulator to effector ratio of 1:1). Each bar represents the mean of triplicate wells and error bars are standard deviations. These data are representative of 2 experiments. (C) IFN-γ ELISPOT assay of NP-specific effector CTLs cultured with KECs (stimulator to effector ratio of 1:30), CD8+ T cells (stimulator to effector ratio of 1:1), or CD8+ T cells plus IL-2. Stimulator cells were pulsed with either NP or OVA peptide. Each bar represents the mean of triplicate wells and error bars are standard deviations. These data are representative of 2 experiments. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001; ns, statistically not significant as calculated using unpaired Student’s t test. (D) Proposed model of the plasticity of CTL responses to antigen encounters and how the data presented in this paper may relate to human diseases. In the steady state (peripheral blood), armed effector CTLs respond to other T cells presenting cognate antigen by killing the stimulator T cell, but do not secrete IFN-γ. The effector CTL itself survives and is anergic. In the context of an inflammatory microenvironment (tumor or other inflamed tissue), exogenous IL-2 licenses the effector CTL to become fully activated and it secretes IFN-γ in addition to killing targets. IFN-γ augments immune responses upregulating antigen processing and presentation as well as promoting the recruitment of leukocytes to the tissue, promoting tumor immunity and autoimmunity seen in paraneoplastic neurologic disease. SFC, spot-forming cells.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts