Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

A TCRα framework–centered codon shapes a biased T cell repertoire through direct MHC and CDR3β interactions
Kristin Støen Gunnarsen, Lene Støkken Høydahl, Louise Fremgaard Risnes, Shiva Dahal-Koirala, Ralf Stefan Neumann, Elin Bergseng, Terje Frigstad, Rahel Frick, M. Fleur du Pré, Bjørn Dalhus, Knut E.A. Lundin, Shuo-Wang Qiao, Ludvig M. Sollid, Inger Sandlie, Geir Åge Løset
Kristin Støen Gunnarsen, Lene Støkken Høydahl, Louise Fremgaard Risnes, Shiva Dahal-Koirala, Ralf Stefan Neumann, Elin Bergseng, Terje Frigstad, Rahel Frick, M. Fleur du Pré, Bjørn Dalhus, Knut E.A. Lundin, Shuo-Wang Qiao, Ludvig M. Sollid, Inger Sandlie, Geir Åge Løset
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology

A TCRα framework–centered codon shapes a biased T cell repertoire through direct MHC and CDR3β interactions

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Selection of biased T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires across individuals is seen in both infectious diseases and autoimmunity, but the underlying molecular basis leading to these shared repertoires remains unclear. Celiac disease (CD) occurs primarily in HLA-DQ2.5+ individuals and is characterized by a CD4+ T cell response against gluten epitopes dominated by DQ2.5-glia-α1a and DQ2.5-glia-α2. The DQ2.5-glia-α2 response recruits a highly biased TCR repertoire composed of TRAV26-1 paired with TRBV7-2 harboring a semipublic CDR3β loop. We aimed to unravel the molecular basis for this signature. By variable gene segment exchange, directed mutagenesis, and cellular T cell activation studies, we found that TRBV7-3 can substitute for TRBV7-2, as both can contain the canonical CDR3β loop. Furthermore, we identified a pivotal germline-encoded MHC recognition motif centered on framework residue Y40 in TRAV26-1 engaging both DQB1*02 and the canonical CDR3β. This allowed prediction of expanded DQ2.5-glia-α2–reactive TCR repertoires, which were confirmed by single-cell sorting and TCR sequencing from CD patient samples. Our data refine our understanding of how HLA-dependent biased TCR repertoires are selected in the periphery due to germline-encoded residues.

Authors

Kristin Støen Gunnarsen, Lene Støkken Høydahl, Louise Fremgaard Risnes, Shiva Dahal-Koirala, Ralf Stefan Neumann, Elin Bergseng, Terje Frigstad, Rahel Frick, M. Fleur du Pré, Bjørn Dalhus, Knut E.A. Lundin, Shuo-Wang Qiao, Ludvig M. Sollid, Inger Sandlie, Geir Åge Løset

×

Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through March 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 1,080 70
PDF 98 15
Figure 255 0
Table 134 0
Supplemental data 40 1
Citation downloads 114 0
Totals 1,721 86
Total Views 1,807
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts